<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Can Google Count?</title>
	<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/can-google-count.html</link>
	<description>Canada's Search and Social Media Authority</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 05:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/can-google-count.html#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 23:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/can-google-count.html#comment-38</guid>
		<description>This is an interesting thought. I have never really looked at things this way, but it would be certainly interesting to see the stats of Google results with a numbered list.

My immediate thoughts are perhaps they are right. If the #1 organic listing has a big fat #1 beside it, perhaps people will skip past the AdWords, as it may flag them as more obvious advertisements reducing Googles Bottom line...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an interesting thought. I have never really looked at things this way, but it would be certainly interesting to see the stats of Google results with a numbered list.</p>
<p>My immediate thoughts are perhaps they are right. If the #1 organic listing has a big fat #1 beside it, perhaps people will skip past the AdWords, as it may flag them as more obvious advertisements reducing Googles Bottom line&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
