<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Search Engine People Blog &#187; Stats</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/category/stats/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com</link>
	<description>Canada's Search and Social Media Authority</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:09:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>488 Percent: Growth Of Google+ To Date (1000 Percent By Weekend)</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/488-percent-growth-of-google-to-date-1000-percent-by-weekend.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/488-percent-growth-of-google-to-date-1000-percent-by-weekend.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 15:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruud Hein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google plus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/488-percent-growth-of-google-to-date-1000-percent-by-weekend.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cross referencing surname counts in Google+ with data from the US Census Bureau, Paul Allen, founder of Ancestry.com, has made estimates about Google+&#039;s current and projected growth. The social network grew 488%: From 1.7 million uses on July 4 to an estimated 10 million users on Tuesday July 12. If the growth continues ax projected [...]<p>Post from: Search Engine People <a href="http://www.searchenginepeople.com">SEO</a> Blog<br/><br/><a href="http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/488-percent-growth-of-google-to-date-1000-percent-by-weekend.html">488 Percent: Growth Of Google+ To Date (1000 Percent By Weekend)</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class=""><a href="http://www.searchenginepeople.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/wpid-Photo-Jul-12-2011-1041-AM.jpg" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.searchenginepeople.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/wpid-Photo-Jul-12-2011-1041-AM.jpg" id="blogsy-1310482813004.7449" class="aligncenter" alt="" width="500" height="375" alt="bar graph showing Google Plus' growth from 1.7 to a projected 20 million users"></a></p>
<p>Cross referencing  surname counts in Google+ with data from the US Census Bureau, Paul Allen, founder of <a href="http://www.ancestry.com">Ancestry.com</a>, has made <a href="https://plus.google.com/117388252776312694644/posts/bGJPTALDkDe">estimates</a> about Google+&#039;s current and projected growth. </p>
<p>The social network grew 488%: From 1.7 million uses on July 4 to an estimated 10 million users on Tuesday July 12.</p>
<p>If the growth continues ax projected Google+ is to reach 20 million users by this weekend: a 1000%+ growth.</p>
<p>Post from: Search Engine People <a href="http://www.searchenginepeople.com">SEO</a> Blog<br/><br/><a href="http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/488-percent-growth-of-google-to-date-1000-percent-by-weekend.html">488 Percent: Growth Of Google+ To Date (1000 Percent By Weekend)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/488-percent-growth-of-google-to-date-1000-percent-by-weekend.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>$1.7 Billion = Marketing Spend On Social Networks</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/social-ad-spend.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/social-ad-spend.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2011 14:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruud Hein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=16870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How much of the 25 billion dollar online ad market goes into social?<p>Post from: Search Engine People <a href="http://www.searchenginepeople.com">SEO</a> Blog<br/><br/><a href="http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/social-ad-spend.html">$1.7 Billion = Marketing Spend On Social Networks</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: block; float: none; margin-left: auto; border-top: 0px; margin-right: auto; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="social-network-advertising-spend" border="0" alt="social-network-advertising-spend" src="http://www.searchenginepeople.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/social-network-advertising-spend.jpg" width="470" height="378" /></p>
<p>eMarketer Inc. estimates the size of the online ad market to be $25.1 billion.</p>
<p>$1.7 billion of that (6.7%) goes to social networks such as Twitter and Facebook.</p>
<p>The remainder goes elsewhere, especially to Google.</p>
<p>Post from: Search Engine People <a href="http://www.searchenginepeople.com">SEO</a> Blog<br/><br/><a href="http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/social-ad-spend.html">$1.7 Billion = Marketing Spend On Social Networks</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/social-ad-spend.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>$120,000 per Day = The Cost Of Twitter Promoted Trends #stats</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/twitter-advertising-costs.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/twitter-advertising-costs.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruud Hein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[promoted accounts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[promoted trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[promoted tweets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=16862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What does it cost to advertise on Twitter?<p>Post from: Search Engine People <a href="http://www.searchenginepeople.com">SEO</a> Blog<br/><br/><a href="http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/twitter-advertising-costs.html">$120,000 per Day = The Cost Of Twitter Promoted Trends #stats</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.clickz.com/clickz/news/2076931/twitter-builds-sales-force-eyes-japan" target="_blank"><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="promoted-trends" border="0" alt="promoted-trends" src="http://www.searchenginepeople.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/promoted-trends.jpg" width="642" height="144" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Promoted Trends: </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>$120,000 per day.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Promoted Accounts: </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Auction based pricing</li>
<li>Minimum spend: $15,000 per 3 months</li>
<li>Minimum Cost Per Follower big $0.50</li>
<li>Average price per follower: under $10</li>
<li>Higher yield bids? Up to $70 per follower.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Promoted Tweets: </strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Auction based pricing</li>
<li>Minimum spend: $15,000 per 3 months</li>
<li>Minimum big: $0.10 per promoted tweet</li>
<li>Prices upwards to $100,000 per promoted tweet</li>
</ul>
<p><em><font size="1" face="Arial">Sources: Adam Bain, director of revenue (Twitter), via </font><a href="http://www.clickz.com/clickz/news/2076931/twitter-builds-sales-force-eyes-japan" target="_blank"><font size="1" face="Arial">Clickz</font></a><font size="1" face="Arial">; </font><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703793804575512711786346900.html?mod=googlenews_wsj" target="_blank"><font size="1" face="Arial">Wall Street Journal</font></a></em></p>
<p>Post from: Search Engine People <a href="http://www.searchenginepeople.com">SEO</a> Blog<br/><br/><a href="http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/twitter-advertising-costs.html">$120,000 per Day = The Cost Of Twitter Promoted Trends #stats</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/twitter-advertising-costs.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>1,000,000,000+ = Number of Unique Google Users Worldwide Per Month #stats</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-largest-site-world.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-largest-site-world.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruud Hein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comscore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-largest-site-world.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has the largest reach in the world.<p>Post from: Search Engine People <a href="http://www.searchenginepeople.com">SEO</a> Blog<br/><br/><a href="http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-largest-site-world.html">1,000,000,000+ = Number of Unique Google Users Worldwide Per Month #stats</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: block; float: none; margin-left: auto; border-top: 0px; margin-right: auto; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="google-largest-site-world" border="0" alt="google-largest-site-world" src="http://www.searchenginepeople.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/google-largest-site-world.jpg" width="471" height="301" /></p>
<p>In June 2011, comScore puts Google&#039;s worldwide reach at <strong>1 billion unique visitors per month</strong>.</p>
<p>While the numbers are impressive they also reveal two &quot;neck on neck&quot; races: Google vs. Microsoft and Facebook vs. Yahoo.</p>
<p>The latter two especially make for an interesting race. Yahoo has been growing quite a bit while Facebook is reaching a level of market penetration where numbers are expected to level off somewhat.</p>
<p>Post from: Search Engine People <a href="http://www.searchenginepeople.com">SEO</a> Blog<br/><br/><a href="http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-largest-site-world.html">1,000,000,000+ = Number of Unique Google Users Worldwide Per Month #stats</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-largest-site-world.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>0.4%  &#8211;  Tumblr&#039;s Advantage Over WordPress.com #stats</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/wordpress-tumblr-stats.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/wordpress-tumblr-stats.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruud Hein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tumblr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/wordpress-tumblr-stats.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The numerical truth on Tumblr vs Wordpress<p>Post from: Search Engine People <a href="http://www.searchenginepeople.com">SEO</a> Blog<br/><br/><a href="http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/wordpress-tumblr-stats.html">0.4%  &#8211;  Tumblr&#039;s Advantage Over WordPress.com #stats</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: block; float: none; margin-left: auto; border-top: 0px; margin-right: auto; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="wordpress-vs-tumblr" border="0" alt="wordpress-vs-tumblr" src="http://www.searchenginepeople.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/wordpress-vs-tumblr.jpg" width="475" height="301" /></p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>Stats on Tumblr and WordPress.com show: Tumblr now hosts more blogs than WordPress.com does.</p>
<p>While the graph looks impressive the difference between the two is just 0.4%</p>
<p>The count doesn&#039;t include blogs using the blogging platform WordPress available from WordPress.org; only the hosted blogs at WordPress.com are taken into account.</p>
<p>Also, it&#039;s not known how many blogs on either site are abandoned.</p>
<h2>Tumblr: More Blogs, Less Popular?</h2>
<p><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: block; float: none; margin-left: auto; border-top: 0px; margin-right: auto; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="wordpress-tumblr-search-volume" border="0" alt="wordpress-tumblr-search-volume" src="http://www.searchenginepeople.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/wordpress-tumblr-search-volume.jpg" width="500" height="233" /></p>
<p>Search popularity for the two is hard(er) to determine. &quot;Tumblr&quot; can be a navigational or informational query. So can &quot;wordpress&quot; but that term can apply to self-hosted blogs as well.</p>
<p>There&#039;s virtually no search volume for &quot;wordpress.com&quot;</p>
<p>Given that the searches for &quot;wordpress&quot; must include destinations other than wordpress.com, Tumblr&#039;s search performance world-wide over the past 12 months is impressive.</p>
<p><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: block; float: none; margin-left: auto; border-top: 0px; margin-right: auto; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="visitor-stats-wordpress-tumblr" border="0" alt="visitor-stats-wordpress-tumblr" src="http://www.searchenginepeople.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/visitor-stats-wordpress-tumblr.jpg" width="497" height="247" /></p>
<p>Still, looking at traffic data as provided by Google Trends (and reflected in data from other providers), Tumblr has a lot of ground to cover before its blogs draw the same amount of daily unique visitors WordPress.com does. </p>
<p><font style="background-color: #ffff00">Do you think the fact that Tumblr has <em>more</em> blogs but a lot less traffic means Tumblr just isn&#039;t that popular?</font></p>
<p>Post from: Search Engine People <a href="http://www.searchenginepeople.com">SEO</a> Blog<br/><br/><a href="http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/wordpress-tumblr-stats.html">0.4%  &#8211;  Tumblr&#039;s Advantage Over WordPress.com #stats</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/wordpress-tumblr-stats.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>3:1&#8212;The Ratio Of PR Professionals vs. Journalists #stats</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/3-to-1-pr-journalism-ratio.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/3-to-1-pr-journalism-ratio.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 14:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruud Hein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=16255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Journalists outnumbered by PR professionals.<p>Post from: Search Engine People <a href="http://www.searchenginepeople.com">SEO</a> Blog<br/><br/><a href="http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/3-to-1-pr-journalism-ratio.html">3:1&mdash;The Ratio Of PR Professionals vs. Journalists #stats</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: block; float: none; margin-left: auto; border-top: 0px; margin-right: auto; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="3-to-1-ratio-pr-journalism" border="0" alt="3-to-1-ratio-pr-journalism" src="http://www.searchenginepeople.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/3-to-1-ratio-pr-journalism.jpg" width="480" height="319" /></p>
<p>According to data from the US Bureau of Labor Statistics, PR professionals outnumber journalists by 3 to 1.</p>
<p>The numbers are possibly much higher by now: the data dates from 2008.</p>
<p><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: block; float: none; margin-left: auto; border-top: 0px; margin-right: auto; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="pr-journalists-population" border="0" alt="pr-journalists-population" src="http://www.searchenginepeople.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/pr-journalists-population.jpg" width="469" height="303" /></p>
<p>Per 100.000 population there were 0.9 PR professionals in 2008 vs. 0.25 journalists.</p>
<p>From 1997 to 2007 there has been a 30% job growth in independent Public Relations. This excludes in-house PR or PR departments in advertising or <a href="http://www.searchenginepeople.com/">SEO</a> agencies.</p>
<p>Meanwhile newspaper newsrooms are 30% smaller than they were in 2000, according to Pew Research.</p>
<p>Post from: Search Engine People <a href="http://www.searchenginepeople.com">SEO</a> Blog<br/><br/><a href="http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/3-to-1-pr-journalism-ratio.html">3:1&mdash;The Ratio Of PR Professionals vs. Journalists #stats</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/3-to-1-pr-journalism-ratio.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>1 in 3 Mobile Phones Is A Smartphone #stats</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/smartphone-stats.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/smartphone-stats.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2011 14:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruud Hein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=16178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1 in 3 mobiles now a smartphone<p>Post from: Search Engine People <a href="http://www.searchenginepeople.com">SEO</a> Blog<br/><br/><a href="http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/smartphone-stats.html">1 in 3 Mobile Phones Is A Smartphone #stats</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: block; float: none; margin-left: auto; border-top: 0px; margin-right: auto; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="1-in-3-mobiles-a-smartphone" border="0" alt="1-in-3-mobiles-a-smartphone" src="http://www.searchenginepeople.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/1-in-3-mobiles-a-smartphone.jpg" width="520" height="381" /></p>
<p>Close to 1 of every 5 Canadians owns a smartphone. That is: every 3rd mobile mobile phone is a smartphone.</p>
<p>Those numbers are more or less on a par with other countries.</p>
<p><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: block; float: none; margin-left: auto; border-top: 0px; margin-right: auto; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="6-in-10-canadians-has-mobile" border="0" alt="6-in-10-canadians-has-mobile" src="http://www.searchenginepeople.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/6-in-10-canadians-has-mobile.jpg" width="437" height="323" /></p>
<p>Close to 6 of every 10 Canadians owns a mobile phone.</p>
<p><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; border-top: 0px; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="rim-apple-most-popular-canada" border="0" alt="rim-apple-most-popular-canada" src="http://www.searchenginepeople.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/rim-apple-most-popular-canada.jpg" width="521" height="373" /></p>
<p>Canada&#039;s most popular smartphone platform is RIM&#039;s Blackberry. Apple is trailing more than 10% behind. The remainder of the market is fragmented without a clear market leader.</p>
<p>Post from: Search Engine People <a href="http://www.searchenginepeople.com">SEO</a> Blog<br/><br/><a href="http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/smartphone-stats.html">1 in 3 Mobile Phones Is A Smartphone #stats</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/smartphone-stats.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter: 300% Advertiser Growth With 80% Retention #stats</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/twitter-300-advertiser-growth-with-80-retention-stats.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/twitter-300-advertiser-growth-with-80-retention-stats.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jun 2011 14:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruud Hein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[graph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/twitter-300-advertiser-growth-with-80-retention-stats.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twitter CEO Dick Costolo says 80% of its advertisers renew their campaign. From EOY 2010 to medio 2011 the number of advertisers on Twitter grew from 150 to 600; a 300% growth. The advertisers are expected to bring Twitter $150 million in advertisement revenue this year. Post from: Search Engine People SEO BlogTwitter: 300% Advertiser [...]<p>Post from: Search Engine People <a href="http://www.searchenginepeople.com">SEO</a> Blog<br/><br/><a href="http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/twitter-300-advertiser-growth-with-80-retention-stats.html">Twitter: 300% Advertiser Growth With 80% Retention #stats</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter CEO Dick Costolo says 80% of its advertisers renew their campaign.</p>
<p>From EOY 2010 to medio 2011 the number of advertisers on Twitter grew from 150 to 600; a 300% growth.</p>
<p>The advertisers are expected to bring Twitter $150 million in advertisement revenue this year.</p>
<p><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: block; float: none; margin-left: auto; border-top: 0px; margin-right: auto; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="80% of Twitter advertisers renew" border="0" alt="80% of Twitter advertisers renew" src="http://www.searchenginepeople.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/80-percent-twitter-advertisers-renew.jpg" width="470" height="305" /></p>
<p><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: block; float: none; margin-left: auto; border-top: 0px; margin-right: auto; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="Number of advertisers on Twitter" border="0" alt="Number of advertisers on Twitter" src="http://www.searchenginepeople.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/300-percent-yoy-twitter-advertiser-growth.jpg" width="470" height="278" /></p>
<p>Post from: Search Engine People <a href="http://www.searchenginepeople.com">SEO</a> Blog<br/><br/><a href="http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/twitter-300-advertiser-growth-with-80-retention-stats.html">Twitter: 300% Advertiser Growth With 80% Retention #stats</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/twitter-300-advertiser-growth-with-80-retention-stats.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook &amp; Twitter Barely Compete With Traditional Marketing Strategies</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/facebook-twitter-roi.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/facebook-twitter-roi.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Feb 2011 19:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dan Cash</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=11890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Email marketing is a more effective marketing tool as traffic driver than social media. A study conducted by the research analysis firm ForeSee Results found that people preferred to hear about what a particular company was doing via email rather than social media. The survey covers the websites for 40 retailers and the survey group [...]<p>Post from: Search Engine People <a href="http://www.searchenginepeople.com">SEO</a> Blog<br/><br/><a href="http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/facebook-twitter-roi.html">Facebook &amp; Twitter Barely Compete With Traditional Marketing Strategies</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Email marketing is a more effective marketing tool as traffic driver than social media.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.foreseeresults.com/news-events/press-releases/social-media-do-results-justify-investment-u.s.-2011-foresee.shtml" target="_blank"><img style="background-image: none; border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: block; float: none; margin-left: auto; border-top: 0px; margin-right: auto; border-right: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="social-media-u.s.-is-it-worth-the-cost-datachart-2011-foresee" border="0" alt="social-media-u.s.-is-it-worth-the-cost-datachart-2011-foresee" src="http://www.searchenginepeople.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/social-media-u.s.-is-it-worth-the-cost-datachart-2011-foresee.gif" width="480" height="310" /></a></p>
<p>A <a href="http://www.foreseeresults.com/research-white-papers/social-media-marketing-2011-form.shtml" target="_blank">study</a> conducted by the research analysis firm <a href="http://www.foreseeresults.com/" target="_blank">ForeSee Results</a> found that people preferred to hear about what a particular company was doing via email rather than social media.</p>
<p>The survey covers the websites for 40 retailers and the survey group totals around 20,000 people. It found that only 5% said social media interactions are their primary influence when it came to driving them toward a particular website. And when they do visit the website because of a social media prompt <strong>they are less likely to purchase</strong> anything than those who visited either from a link in an email or via search.</p>
<p>19% of website views came about thanks to promotional emails and 8% due to search engine results, nearly a quarter thanks to ‘traditional’ e-marketing methods compared to the fractional results produced by social media.</p>
<p>In terms of converting time and money spent into revenue and profit social media is valuable but it’s much more a long game than a well placed email and an efficient <a href="http://www.searchenginepeople.com/">SEO</a> campaign. </p>
<p>Post from: Search Engine People <a href="http://www.searchenginepeople.com">SEO</a> Blog<br/><br/><a href="http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/facebook-twitter-roi.html">Facebook &amp; Twitter Barely Compete With Traditional Marketing Strategies</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/facebook-twitter-roi.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter More Popular Than Money, Superbowl</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/twitter-superbowl.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/twitter-superbowl.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 16:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ruud Hein</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Stats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=11519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Experian noted that US visits to Twitter have fallen by 14% over the past year. Which makes a great headline. For a moment you can see the questions arriving at marketing that day: &#34;should we really be on Twitter?&#34;, or, &#34;should we stay on Twitter?&#34; &#34;I told you so&#34; emails to the Social Media Manager [...]<p>Post from: Search Engine People <a href="http://www.searchenginepeople.com">SEO</a> Blog<br/><br/><a href="http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/twitter-superbowl.html">Twitter More Popular Than Money, Superbowl</a></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.experian.com/blogs/marketing-forward/2011/01/25/americans-spend-2-hours-13-minutes-per-month-on-twitter-com/" target="_blank">Experian noted</a> that US visits to Twitter have fallen by 14% over the past year. Which makes a great headline.</p>
<p><a href="http://mashable.com/2011/01/26/twitter-com-fell-14/" target="_blank"><img style="background-image: none; border-right-width: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="Visitors to Twitter.com Fell 14% in 2010 [STATS]" border="0" alt="Visitors to Twitter.com Fell 14% in 2010 [STATS]" src="http://www.searchenginepeople.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/SNAGHTML2816831.png" width="640" height="213" /></a></p>
<p>For a moment you can see the questions arriving at marketing that day: &quot;should we really be on Twitter?&quot;, or, &quot;should we stay on Twitter?&quot;</p>
<p>&quot;I told you so&quot; emails to the Social Media Manager or &quot;…but I thought you said…&quot; messages.</p>
<p>Don&#039;t worry. Just put it into perspective.</p>
<p><img style="background-image: none; border-right-width: 0px; padding-left: 0px; padding-right: 0px; display: inline; border-top-width: 0px; border-bottom-width: 0px; border-left-width: 0px; padding-top: 0px" title="2011-01-29 10-30-23 " border="0" alt="2011-01-29 10-30-23 " src="http://www.searchenginepeople.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/2011-01-29-10-30-23-.jpg" width="640" height="923" /></p>
<p>Post from: Search Engine People <a href="http://www.searchenginepeople.com">SEO</a> Blog<br/><br/><a href="http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/twitter-superbowl.html">Twitter More Popular Than Money, Superbowl</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/twitter-superbowl.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

