<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Sees What You Hide in Images</title>
	<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-sees-what-you-hide-in-images.html</link>
	<description>Canada's Search and Social Media Authority</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 03:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Links for week 51/07</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-sees-what-you-hide-in-images.html#comment-285</link>
		<dc:creator>Links for week 51/07</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 14:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-sees-what-you-hide-in-images.html#comment-285</guid>
		<description>[...] Google Sees What You Hide in Images [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Google Sees What You Hide in Images [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-sees-what-you-hide-in-images.html#comment-284</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 05:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-sees-what-you-hide-in-images.html#comment-284</guid>
		<description>Wow...I didn't even realize that they could do something like that. Looks like they are really serious about getting rid of paid links. But why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230;I didn&#8217;t even realize that they could do something like that. Looks like they are really serious about getting rid of paid links. But why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabfire &#187; Links for week 46</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-sees-what-you-hide-in-images.html#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabfire &#187; Links for week 46</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 16:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-sees-what-you-hide-in-images.html#comment-277</guid>
		<description>[...] Google Sees What You Hide in Images [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Google Sees What You Hide in Images [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 5ubliminal</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-sees-what-you-hide-in-images.html#comment-278</link>
		<dc:creator>5ubliminal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 15:50:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-sees-what-you-hide-in-images.html#comment-278</guid>
		<description>The last 10 seconds can easily be labeled as g4y but I won't do it.

I'd pick MS Outlook over GMail anytime and I do! Host your own email or enjoy the 'benefits' and 'privacy' of hosted services.

PS: Nice spam check. I vow? God! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last 10 seconds can easily be labeled as g4y but I won&#8217;t do it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d pick MS Outlook over GMail anytime and I do! Host your own email or enjoy the &#8216;benefits&#8217; and &#8216;privacy&#8217; of hosted services.</p>
<p>PS: Nice spam check. I vow? God! <img src='http://www.searchenginepeople.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Expert Canada</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-sees-what-you-hide-in-images.html#comment-279</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Expert Canada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 06:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-sees-what-you-hide-in-images.html#comment-279</guid>
		<description>LOL!  Now if only they could get better at cloaking detection :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL!  Now if only they could get better at cloaking detection <img src='http://www.searchenginepeople.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jab</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-sees-what-you-hide-in-images.html#comment-280</link>
		<dc:creator>Jab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 05:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-sees-what-you-hide-in-images.html#comment-280</guid>
		<description>Anyway,...as they try to fight paid-links this is maybe one thing Google really plans to try/ do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyway,&#8230;as they try to fight paid-links this is maybe one thing Google really plans to try/ do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Utah SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-sees-what-you-hide-in-images.html#comment-281</link>
		<dc:creator>Utah SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 04:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-sees-what-you-hide-in-images.html#comment-281</guid>
		<description>I just tried searching on SEObythesea.com and couldn't find it but last year I read about a Google patent with analyzing vector points in an image to be able to read what that image is of. It was use a lot of computation to use this same technology for text but it's very possible.

Just imagine, duplicate content filters for similar imagery, not just textual content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just tried searching on SEObythesea.com and couldn&#8217;t find it but last year I read about a Google patent with analyzing vector points in an image to be able to read what that image is of. It was use a lot of computation to use this same technology for text but it&#8217;s very possible.</p>
<p>Just imagine, duplicate content filters for similar imagery, not just textual content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bLuefRogX</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-sees-what-you-hide-in-images.html#comment-282</link>
		<dc:creator>bLuefRogX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 02:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-sees-what-you-hide-in-images.html#comment-282</guid>
		<description>I don't see them doing this for regular websites anytime soon, the sheer computing power it'd take would probably offset the benefits, and even if they do, it wouldn't be that hard to skew the text so its harder to read, most OCRs can't handle that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see them doing this for regular websites anytime soon, the sheer computing power it&#8217;d take would probably offset the benefits, and even if they do, it wouldn&#8217;t be that hard to skew the text so its harder to read, most OCRs can&#8217;t handle that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Igor The Troll</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-sees-what-you-hide-in-images.html#comment-283</link>
		<dc:creator>Igor The Troll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Nov 2007 00:20:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-sees-what-you-hide-in-images.html#comment-283</guid>
		<description>Sounds like more fear than practical.

Google will be leaking bandwidth and computing power all over the place, if it tries to scan every image.

When you check the cache of your pages, do the images cached by Google or still on your server?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds like more fear than practical.</p>
<p>Google will be leaking bandwidth and computing power all over the place, if it tries to scan every image.</p>
<p>When you check the cache of your pages, do the images cached by Google or still on your server?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
