<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Generate SEO Insights for New Business Prospects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/how-to-generate-seo-insights-for-new-business-prospects.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/how-to-generate-seo-insights-for-new-business-prospects.html</link>
	<description>Canada's Search and Social Media Authority</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:01:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Korody</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/how-to-generate-seo-insights-for-new-business-prospects.html#comment-15470</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Korody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=5467#comment-15470</guid>
		<description>I very much like this post for two reasons.

First, doing this kind of upfront analysis is just smart salesmanship. There is only one thing that a client cares about and it is good to be knowledgeable about it. Specific examples have ten times the power of vague generalizations. Besides it makes you look just a bit hungry which is never bad...

I also appreciate having the methodology so cleanly and crisply spelled out. Nothing like not having to reinvent the wheel!

Thnx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I very much like this post for two reasons.</p>
<p>First, doing this kind of upfront analysis is just smart salesmanship. There is only one thing that a client cares about and it is good to be knowledgeable about it. Specific examples have ten times the power of vague generalizations. Besides it makes you look just a bit hungry which is never bad&#8230;</p>
<p>I also appreciate having the methodology so cleanly and crisply spelled out. Nothing like not having to reinvent the wheel!</p>
<p>Thnx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: free mp3</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/how-to-generate-seo-insights-for-new-business-prospects.html#comment-15239</link>
		<dc:creator>free mp3</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 06:09:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=5467#comment-15239</guid>
		<description>Typically you can use Yahoo Site Explorer as a decent tool for this, and it does work to a certain extent, but if a site has 30,000 random inbound links, you have to weed through them all to find the important ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Typically you can use Yahoo Site Explorer as a decent tool for this, and it does work to a certain extent, but if a site has 30,000 random inbound links, you have to weed through them all to find the important ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt M.</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/how-to-generate-seo-insights-for-new-business-prospects.html#comment-15192</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 01:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=5467#comment-15192</guid>
		<description>We use the SEOmoz tools at our company, specifically Linkscape. Linkscape is great because it actually does rate the inbound links by a variety of factors and lets you sort out the nofollows and such. Typically you can use Yahoo Site Explorer as a decent tool for this, and it does work to a certain extent, but if a site has 30,000 random inbound links, you have to weed through them all to find the important ones. More often than not, about 99% of the inbound links equal up to the value of the top 1% which are actually high quality, highly optimized links.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We use the SEOmoz tools at our company, specifically Linkscape. Linkscape is great because it actually does rate the inbound links by a variety of factors and lets you sort out the nofollows and such. Typically you can use Yahoo Site Explorer as a decent tool for this, and it does work to a certain extent, but if a site has 30,000 random inbound links, you have to weed through them all to find the important ones. More often than not, about 99% of the inbound links equal up to the value of the top 1% which are actually high quality, highly optimized links.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bob</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/how-to-generate-seo-insights-for-new-business-prospects.html#comment-15110</link>
		<dc:creator>bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 16:18:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=5467#comment-15110</guid>
		<description>Interesting coments about the SEOmoz tools. I also under utilize them and am certain this is holding me back. The trouble is there are a lot of tools around and picking the best is key!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting coments about the SEOmoz tools. I also under utilize them and am certain this is holding me back. The trouble is there are a lot of tools around and picking the best is key!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

