Going through just one additional step in your video publishing process can increase your exposure hundreds, thousands of times while at the same time increasing the number of times your material is referenced.
While online video, the “second screen”, and video via mobile devices, the “third screen”, is all the rage and its market keeps growing virtually overnight, video consumption is far behind regular web content.
This is the perspective: about half of the Internet users in the USA view about 1-10 videos … per week – while the same average Internet user surfed 111 domain, 2554 pages in a month. That’s 576 pages in a week.
576 pages versus 10 videos – think about that before doing your next vlog (video blog) post.
1. We like to gauge value by scanning a page; “is this of interest?” – you can’t scan video
2. Video requires extra equipment; text on page doesn’t
3. Text is copy-and-paste friendly, encouraging and enabling sharing
Sharing is forwarding a link to someone.
Referencing is you quoting someone somewhere and linking back to the source.
You don’t get that with video.
The best you can hope with video is that, like Lyndon does in the tweet above, it gets shared. Knowing Lyndon, this content must be top-notch or he wouldn’t share it but I can tell you two things about it:
In that same time I could have read tens of pages – and that’s what I rather do then.
It’s the number 4 under “Why Written Words Outperfom Video”: video eats actual time. It’s not that it’s not worth the investment; it’s that we don’t get to gauge it (no scanning) so the safe bet is to click away.
Video, audio, images, Flash: what they have in common is that on a web page they should play a supporting role, an almost decorative role. They should be the “also” not the “instead of”.
Once your video is made, go through the simple step of transcribing and possibly describing its content.
The added on-page text will:
Additional Reading
Tweets by Elisa Gabbert (Wordstream Keyword Research) and Lyndon Antcliff (Cornwall SEO)
Get the SEP Newsletter
Very true
I'd venture that anything that is 'real time' is going to suffer in the face of 'written down' and 'search'.
Its about automation isn't it? The ability to write down your best stuff and have it available 24/7 to people who are specifically interested in what you have to say….that makes economic sense.
However, on one page, a customer video improved conversions by about 50%… so, salt and pepper for my hat please.
Matt
.-= matt lambert recently posted: What should you blog about? =-.
5,760%? I think you mean 5,660%
Nice absolute comparison, but is it relative? Have you considered that users browse more text pages than videos *because* there are more text pages than videos? Especially in search it seems, you've got Sage Lewis and Whitebored Friday (not a misspell) facing up to 100s of text posts per day!
Those are valid insights, Jack.
My gut feeling is that, no, people browse more text pages because it's text. On-page text is the fastest consumable expansive content carrier. This 20 minute TED Talk, one of my favorites, can be shown on this one page.
Mind you, I don't want to argue do one instead of the other; I suggest to combine the two.
It is also valid that people can get access much faster to whole of the information via text based pages instead of waiting for the video first to load up and then see whats inside. Don't you think?
I was expecting an "epiphany" from the title, didn't realize you were simply going to suggest adding a transcript…. I guess it is that simple.
I wouldn't think videos were so "unpopular" – the numbers you have used really surprised me.
Great article.