<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ruud Questions: Cindy Krum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/ruud-questions-cindy-krum.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/ruud-questions-cindy-krum.html</link>
	<description>Canada's Search and Social Media Authority</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:28:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bryson Meunier</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/ruud-questions-cindy-krum.html#comment-9295</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryson Meunier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 15:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=3857#comment-9295</guid>
		<description>Cindy, great interview! Always a pleasure to see mobile SEO get attention outside of our niche community, and you know I&#039;ve enjoyed hearing you speak on the subject for years. Of course, we don&#039;t always agree on the best ways to bring visibility to a brand from mobile users, and this is no exception. Totally disagree about the robots.txt exclusion for mobile content and not needing a mobile site to be optimized, as I explained in a recent post: http://www.brysonmeunier.com/less-is-not-more-in-mobile-seo-two-worst-practices-to-avoid/ .  It&#039;s a common misconception, but it can actually make your brand unnecessarily less visible to mobile users, which is not really optimization. I would have also mentioned the Google Mobile Keyword Tool (http://www.brysonmeunier.com/finding-the-google-mobile-keyword-tool/) as a valuable tool to help with optimization. Otherwise, I appreciate your focus on goals, as there&#039;s not really a one-size-fits-all approach to mobile SEO, and enjoyed the interview.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cindy, great interview! Always a pleasure to see mobile SEO get attention outside of our niche community, and you know I&#039;ve enjoyed hearing you speak on the subject for years. Of course, we don&#039;t always agree on the best ways to bring visibility to a brand from mobile users, and this is no exception. Totally disagree about the robots.txt exclusion for mobile content and not needing a mobile site to be optimized, as I explained in a recent post: <a href="http://www.brysonmeunier.com/less-is-not-more-in-mobile-seo-two-worst-practices-to-avoid/" rel="nofollow">http://www.brysonmeunier.com/less-is-not-more-in-mobile-seo-two-worst-practices-to-avoid/</a> .  It&#039;s a common misconception, but it can actually make your brand unnecessarily less visible to mobile users, which is not really optimization. I would have also mentioned the Google Mobile Keyword Tool (<a href="http://www.brysonmeunier.com/finding-the-google-mobile-keyword-tool/" rel="nofollow">http://www.brysonmeunier.com/finding-the-google-mobile-keyword-tool/</a>) as a valuable tool to help with optimization. Otherwise, I appreciate your focus on goals, as there&#039;s not really a one-size-fits-all approach to mobile SEO, and enjoyed the interview.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Quipp</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/ruud-questions-cindy-krum.html#comment-9118</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Quipp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 14:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=3857#comment-9118</guid>
		<description>Great interview Cindy! You&#039;re always such a wealth of information about mobile!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great interview Cindy! You&#039;re always such a wealth of information about mobile!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
