<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Semantics: call it consumer friendly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/semantics-call-it-consumer-friendly.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/semantics-call-it-consumer-friendly.html</link>
	<description>Canada's Search and Social Media Authority</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:01:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Learn SEO: Assessing Your Sites Usability</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/semantics-call-it-consumer-friendly.html#comment-1249</link>
		<dc:creator>Learn SEO: Assessing Your Sites Usability</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/semantics-call-it-consumer-friendly.html#comment-1249</guid>
		<description>[...] I picked the chapter about usability because I had just stopped by Ruuds short but sweet post entitled &#8220;Semantics: Call It User Friendly&#8220;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I picked the chapter about usability because I had just stopped by Ruuds short but sweet post entitled &#034;Semantics: Call It User Friendly&#034;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruud Hein</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/semantics-call-it-consumer-friendly.html#comment-1250</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruud Hein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/semantics-call-it-consumer-friendly.html#comment-1250</guid>
		<description>@Nick Still learning myself. In this post I could (should) have made the connection between the tech and plain more clear but the basic point is across, I see.

@Rob An conversational intro like that often puts me in the right mood for a post :)

@Kimberly Maybe a little bit -- against myself :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Nick Still learning myself. In this post I could (should) have made the connection between the tech and plain more clear but the basic point is across, I see.</p>
<p>@Rob An conversational intro like that often puts me in the right mood for a post <img src='http://www.searchenginepeople.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>@Kimberly Maybe a little bit &#8212; against myself <img src='http://www.searchenginepeople.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spostareduro</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/semantics-call-it-consumer-friendly.html#comment-1251</link>
		<dc:creator>spostareduro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/semantics-call-it-consumer-friendly.html#comment-1251</guid>
		<description>hmm...A rant Ruud?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm&#8230;A rant Ruud?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Make Money Blogging</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/semantics-call-it-consumer-friendly.html#comment-1252</link>
		<dc:creator>Make Money Blogging</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/semantics-call-it-consumer-friendly.html#comment-1252</guid>
		<description>Like you said short and sweet. I recently had to ask what POSH stood for and it was as simple as &quot;Plain Old Sematic HTML&quot; Still with the meaning the word sematic which again meant nothing - so thank you for speaking human ;o)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like you said short and sweet. I recently had to ask what POSH stood for and it was as simple as &#034;Plain Old Sematic HTML&#034; Still with the meaning the word sematic which again meant nothing &#8211; so thank you for speaking human ;o)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick James</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/semantics-call-it-consumer-friendly.html#comment-1253</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/semantics-call-it-consumer-friendly.html#comment-1253</guid>
		<description>Short and succinct, Ruud, just like the point you are making. I think plain speaking and English is all too lacking in many walks of life today (I know I&#039;ve been guilty of beating about the bush myself, on my blog at least - using ten words where two will do).
Of course, a customer will be far more trusting of somebody who tells it to them straight instead of trying to fox them with an endless tirade of teccy-speak.
Good post, Ruud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Short and succinct, Ruud, just like the point you are making. I think plain speaking and English is all too lacking in many walks of life today (I know I&#039;ve been guilty of beating about the bush myself, on my blog at least &#8211; using ten words where two will do).<br />
Of course, a customer will be far more trusting of somebody who tells it to them straight instead of trying to fox them with an endless tirade of teccy-speak.<br />
Good post, Ruud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

