<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Semantics: call it consumer friendly</title>
	<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/semantics-call-it-consumer-friendly.html</link>
	<description>Canada's Search and Social Media Authority</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Learn SEO: Assessing Your Sites Usability</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/semantics-call-it-consumer-friendly.html#comment-1249</link>
		<dc:creator>Learn SEO: Assessing Your Sites Usability</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/semantics-call-it-consumer-friendly.html#comment-1249</guid>
		<description>[...] I picked the chapter about usability because I had just stopped by Ruuds short but sweet post entitled &#8220;Semantics: Call It User Friendly&#8220;. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I picked the chapter about usability because I had just stopped by Ruuds short but sweet post entitled &#8220;Semantics: Call It User Friendly&#8220;. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ruud Hein</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/semantics-call-it-consumer-friendly.html#comment-1250</link>
		<dc:creator>Ruud Hein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/semantics-call-it-consumer-friendly.html#comment-1250</guid>
		<description>@Nick Still learning myself. In this post I could (should) have made the connection between the tech and plain more clear but the basic point is across, I see.

@Rob An conversational intro like that often puts me in the right mood for a post :)

@Kimberly Maybe a little bit -- against myself :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Nick Still learning myself. In this post I could (should) have made the connection between the tech and plain more clear but the basic point is across, I see.</p>
<p>@Rob An conversational intro like that often puts me in the right mood for a post <img src='http://www.searchenginepeople.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
@Kimberly Maybe a little bit &#8212; against myself <img src='http://www.searchenginepeople.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: spostareduro</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/semantics-call-it-consumer-friendly.html#comment-1251</link>
		<dc:creator>spostareduro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/semantics-call-it-consumer-friendly.html#comment-1251</guid>
		<description>hmm...A rant Ruud?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmm&#8230;A rant Ruud?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Make Money Blogging</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/semantics-call-it-consumer-friendly.html#comment-1252</link>
		<dc:creator>Make Money Blogging</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/semantics-call-it-consumer-friendly.html#comment-1252</guid>
		<description>Like you said short and sweet. I recently had to ask what POSH stood for and it was as simple as "Plain Old Sematic HTML" Still with the meaning the word sematic which again meant nothing - so thank you for speaking human ;o)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like you said short and sweet. I recently had to ask what POSH stood for and it was as simple as &#8220;Plain Old Sematic HTML&#8221; Still with the meaning the word sematic which again meant nothing - so thank you for speaking human ;o)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick James</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/semantics-call-it-consumer-friendly.html#comment-1253</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 10:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/semantics-call-it-consumer-friendly.html#comment-1253</guid>
		<description>Short and succinct, Ruud, just like the point you are making. I think plain speaking and English is all too lacking in many walks of life today (I know I've been guilty of beating about the bush myself, on my blog at least - using ten words where two will do).
Of course, a customer will be far more trusting of somebody who tells it to them straight instead of trying to fox them with an endless tirade of teccy-speak.
Good post, Ruud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Short and succinct, Ruud, just like the point you are making. I think plain speaking and English is all too lacking in many walks of life today (I know I&#8217;ve been guilty of beating about the bush myself, on my blog at least - using ten words where two will do).<br />
Of course, a customer will be far more trusting of somebody who tells it to them straight instead of trying to fox them with an endless tirade of teccy-speak.<br />
Good post, Ruud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
