<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The History of Paid Directories</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/the-history-of-paid-directories.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/the-history-of-paid-directories.html</link>
	<description>Canada's Search and Social Media Authority</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:28:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ronnie T. Dodger</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/the-history-of-paid-directories.html#comment-4054</link>
		<dc:creator>Ronnie T. Dodger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 00:58:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/the-history-of-paid-directories.html#comment-4054</guid>
		<description>Paul, wasn&#039;t the reason for UncoverTheNet being wiped from the index because of MyWebNews, who allegedly hijacked their pages? MyWebNews is now defunct, but a look back into the Archives reveals that they were scraping the UTN website:

http://web.archive.org/web/20070309160412/http://mywebnews.net/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, wasn&#039;t the reason for UncoverTheNet being wiped from the index because of MyWebNews, who allegedly hijacked their pages? MyWebNews is now defunct, but a look back into the Archives reveals that they were scraping the UTN website:</p>
<p><a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20070309160412/http://mywebnews.net/" rel="nofollow">http://web.archive.org/web/20070309160412/http://mywebnews.net/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paid Surveys</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/the-history-of-paid-directories.html#comment-4006</link>
		<dc:creator>Paid Surveys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 21:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/the-history-of-paid-directories.html#comment-4006</guid>
		<description>This is exactly why I hardly ever use paid directories. If I have paid $50+ for in a link in one of these, only to fine its been hit with a Google ban I would be very frustrated. I only ever do a few free directory submissions, and apart from DMOZ, Yahoo, BOTW and Joeant I don&#039;t really bother. Unfortunately its too hard to say whether they really do have an impact on your websites Rankings so people continue to pay for it anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is exactly why I hardly ever use paid directories. If I have paid $50+ for in a link in one of these, only to fine its been hit with a Google ban I would be very frustrated. I only ever do a few free directory submissions, and apart from DMOZ, Yahoo, BOTW and Joeant I don&#039;t really bother. Unfortunately its too hard to say whether they really do have an impact on your websites Rankings so people continue to pay for it anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Teitelman</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/the-history-of-paid-directories.html#comment-3912</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Teitelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 18:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/the-history-of-paid-directories.html#comment-3912</guid>
		<description>@Blanca... No worries, best of luck to ya!

@Ted... Wow you really have some objections to this post eh? I&#039;m sure you could show me a bunch of high PR directories that are of low quality; there are plenty of them! 

If you want to reveal them be my guest, in terms of offering an explanation I don&#039;t think that&#039;s necessary, I&#039;m not Google nor did I write their algorithm. 

All I can suggest is that these directories will continue to get penalized going forward, so although they currently have a high PR they won&#039;t be able to MAINTAIN it like the higher quality directories that I mentioned in the post do. Hopefully you now see the point I was trying to make about PR and directories; the hard part is maintaining the high PR over a long period of time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Blanca&#8230; No worries, best of luck to ya!</p>
<p>@Ted&#8230; Wow you really have some objections to this post eh? I&#039;m sure you could show me a bunch of high PR directories that are of low quality; there are plenty of them! </p>
<p>If you want to reveal them be my guest, in terms of offering an explanation I don&#039;t think that&#039;s necessary, I&#039;m not Google nor did I write their algorithm. </p>
<p>All I can suggest is that these directories will continue to get penalized going forward, so although they currently have a high PR they won&#039;t be able to MAINTAIN it like the higher quality directories that I mentioned in the post do. Hopefully you now see the point I was trying to make about PR and directories; the hard part is maintaining the high PR over a long period of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/the-history-of-paid-directories.html#comment-3875</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 03:47:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/the-history-of-paid-directories.html#comment-3875</guid>
		<description>Well, I can show you more counter-examples than yours, where directories which accept crap sites have good PR. Can you offer explanation for those cases if I reveal them? :-)

The point is, PR is useless when it comes to measuring the quality of a directory.
So, your statement vouching for the relationship between PR and site quality is simply baseless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I can show you more counter-examples than yours, where directories which accept crap sites have good PR. Can you offer explanation for those cases if I reveal them? <img src='http://www.searchenginepeople.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>The point is, PR is useless when it comes to measuring the quality of a directory.<br />
So, your statement vouching for the relationship between PR and site quality is simply baseless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blanca</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/the-history-of-paid-directories.html#comment-3825</link>
		<dc:creator>Blanca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 20:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/the-history-of-paid-directories.html#comment-3825</guid>
		<description>thanks for your reply to my post. I will continue to focus on content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for your reply to my post. I will continue to focus on content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Teitelman</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/the-history-of-paid-directories.html#comment-3824</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Teitelman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 19:37:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/the-history-of-paid-directories.html#comment-3824</guid>
		<description>@ Singapore... Good call as there are much better ways to spend that $300!

@ Utah... I&#039;ve never dismissed the importance of submitting to directories, in fact it&#039;s quite the opposite. You just need to ensure you are submitting to quality directories that&#039;s all. 

@ Ted... These are simply examples of powerful directories that have maintained their PR, if you&#039;ve got a better explanation as to why they&#039;ve maintained their PR as opposed to other directories who have lost theirs I&#039;m all ears.

@ Blanca... content is king! Focus on providing great content and the links will come. If they don&#039;t, then syndicate the article and socialize it as well. It&#039;s still all about the backlinks though so you were right the first time around.

@ VM... you&#039;re right about the traffic but I was just referring to their effect on the SERP&#039;s and rankings.

@ Pushkar/web hosting/eva/sean... Agree with everything you all said; building and maintaining a quality directory is very tough. Especially going forward as Google continuously strives to try and penalize directories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Singapore&#8230; Good call as there are much better ways to spend that $300!</p>
<p>@ Utah&#8230; I&#039;ve never dismissed the importance of submitting to directories, in fact it&#039;s quite the opposite. You just need to ensure you are submitting to quality directories that&#039;s all. </p>
<p>@ Ted&#8230; These are simply examples of powerful directories that have maintained their PR, if you&#039;ve got a better explanation as to why they&#039;ve maintained their PR as opposed to other directories who have lost theirs I&#039;m all ears.</p>
<p>@ Blanca&#8230; content is king! Focus on providing great content and the links will come. If they don&#039;t, then syndicate the article and socialize it as well. It&#039;s still all about the backlinks though so you were right the first time around.</p>
<p>@ VM&#8230; you&#039;re right about the traffic but I was just referring to their effect on the SERP&#039;s and rankings.</p>
<p>@ Pushkar/web hosting/eva/sean&#8230; Agree with everything you all said; building and maintaining a quality directory is very tough. Especially going forward as Google continuously strives to try and penalize directories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/the-history-of-paid-directories.html#comment-3819</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 12:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/the-history-of-paid-directories.html#comment-3819</guid>
		<description>Its a hard time for directory owners, thats for sure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its a hard time for directory owners, thats for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SeanM</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/the-history-of-paid-directories.html#comment-3743</link>
		<dc:creator>SeanM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 14:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/the-history-of-paid-directories.html#comment-3743</guid>
		<description>Great information to help decide on whether to pay to have your site listed on a directory like that or not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great information to help decide on whether to pay to have your site listed on a directory like that or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eva White</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/the-history-of-paid-directories.html#comment-3736</link>
		<dc:creator>Eva White</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 11:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/the-history-of-paid-directories.html#comment-3736</guid>
		<description>Building a good directory and then maintaining its pr has to be one of the toughest jobs today. Specially when people are trying to push their web pages into search engines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Building a good directory and then maintaining its pr has to be one of the toughest jobs today. Specially when people are trying to push their web pages into search engines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Web Hosting Coupon Codes</title>
		<link>http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/the-history-of-paid-directories.html#comment-3718</link>
		<dc:creator>Web Hosting Coupon Codes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 02:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/the-history-of-paid-directories.html#comment-3718</guid>
		<description>The alive directory thing was the worse. Many people spend hundreds of dollars on links from that directory</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The alive directory thing was the worse. Many people spend hundreds of dollars on links from that directory</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
