<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Google&#8217;s New Manual Penalty Targets Rich Snippet Spam	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/125-google-rich-snippet-manual-penalty.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/125-google-rich-snippet-manual-penalty.html?utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s Search and Social Media Authority</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2017 01:49:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Josh		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/125-google-rich-snippet-manual-penalty.html/comment-page-1#comment-691223</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2014 20:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=44591#comment-691223</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This makes sense.  It fits well with Google&#039;s overall aim of wanting to provide the most relevant and accurate results for its users.  It seems strange to me that some webmasters would actually try to mark up content that is invisible to users ... its as if they don&#039;t think Google can write code that will detect it.  Good to see Google is backing up its spoken expectation that websites that provide the most useful information to end users will be the ones that rank well.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This makes sense.  It fits well with Google&#8217;s overall aim of wanting to provide the most relevant and accurate results for its users.  It seems strange to me that some webmasters would actually try to mark up content that is invisible to users &#8230; its as if they don&#8217;t think Google can write code that will detect it.  Good to see Google is backing up its spoken expectation that websites that provide the most useful information to end users will be the ones that rank well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
