<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Social Signals Suck: Why Google Still Prefers The Gameable Link	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/15104-google-links-vs-social.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/15104-google-links-vs-social.html?utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s Search and Social Media Authority</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2017 01:39:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: James McInally		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/15104-google-links-vs-social.html/comment-page-1#comment-1056966</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James McInally]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2015 22:55:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=61161#comment-1056966</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hey Gary, it still perplexes me that so many people bang on about social signals influencing SEO. I have many clients who don&#039;t have strong social signals and rank very well. Indeed, I see ZERO correlation, apart from what you mention about good social and blogging having a better chance of link acquisition. The opportunity cost of social media is less resources in link building. I still see social media marketing as a red herring when it comes to online direct marketing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Gary, it still perplexes me that so many people bang on about social signals influencing SEO. I have many clients who don&#8217;t have strong social signals and rank very well. Indeed, I see ZERO correlation, apart from what you mention about good social and blogging having a better chance of link acquisition. The opportunity cost of social media is less resources in link building. I still see social media marketing as a red herring when it comes to online direct marketing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Shannon		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/15104-google-links-vs-social.html/comment-page-1#comment-1056689</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shannon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2015 17:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=61161#comment-1056689</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Loved this post Gary! It will be very interesting to see how Google does with social media links. I knew years ago that social media links were going to become more and more important. But how Google figures it out, as you mentioned, is going to be a PITA for them lol. Like I said, it will be interesting to see what/how Google does with it!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loved this post Gary! It will be very interesting to see how Google does with social media links. I knew years ago that social media links were going to become more and more important. But how Google figures it out, as you mentioned, is going to be a PITA for them lol. Like I said, it will be interesting to see what/how Google does with it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
