<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Social Scoop: Twitter App Spotlight, Instagram Advertising Options	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/16012-social-scoop.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/16012-social-scoop.html?utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s Search and Social Media Authority</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2017 01:38:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Dan		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/16012-social-scoop.html/comment-page-1#comment-1062257</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2016 17:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=62382#comment-1062257</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This was a nice little catch-me-up, thanks Jennifer!

I do like seeing improved integration for promotional content. Having in-line install buttons on Twitter and promoted posts on Instagram feels like a(n albeit small) stepping stone toward a more unified interface/experience for social, and mobile could really use a lot more of these small tweaks/features.

I&#039;d be curious to see performance metrics for B2C vs. B2B, though...I know that in my own browsing, I tend to treat native-like content more kindly when it&#039;s aimed at me, personally.  Even though I tend to like seeing B2B ads (whether for inspiration, ideas, new opportunities), I feel like I&#039;m more receptive to B2B when it&#039;s overt and obvious. 

For example, I think I&#039;d almost miss seeing a CTA button on an Instagram post if it were promoting some cloud collaboration tool for teams/business, but I VERY much would prefer to see a native post promoting some entrepreneur&#039;s artisanal engraved cheese Etsy shop (or whathaveyou) that I can just appreciate with the rest of my feed.

Curious if that&#039;s consistent with expected/measured behaviour industry-wide -- is there a performance difference for B2C/B2B promotions that use native app behaviour? 
Or does that data even exist?

Lots to think about, thanks again!

Dan]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was a nice little catch-me-up, thanks Jennifer!</p>
<p>I do like seeing improved integration for promotional content. Having in-line install buttons on Twitter and promoted posts on Instagram feels like a(n albeit small) stepping stone toward a more unified interface/experience for social, and mobile could really use a lot more of these small tweaks/features.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be curious to see performance metrics for B2C vs. B2B, though&#8230;I know that in my own browsing, I tend to treat native-like content more kindly when it&#8217;s aimed at me, personally.  Even though I tend to like seeing B2B ads (whether for inspiration, ideas, new opportunities), I feel like I&#8217;m more receptive to B2B when it&#8217;s overt and obvious. </p>
<p>For example, I think I&#8217;d almost miss seeing a CTA button on an Instagram post if it were promoting some cloud collaboration tool for teams/business, but I VERY much would prefer to see a native post promoting some entrepreneur&#8217;s artisanal engraved cheese Etsy shop (or whathaveyou) that I can just appreciate with the rest of my feed.</p>
<p>Curious if that&#8217;s consistent with expected/measured behaviour industry-wide &#8212; is there a performance difference for B2C/B2B promotions that use native app behaviour?<br />
Or does that data even exist?</p>
<p>Lots to think about, thanks again!</p>
<p>Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
