<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 9 Changes Google Has Made That Affect SEO&#8217;s In 2016	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/16063-seo-google-changes.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/16063-seo-google-changes.html?utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s Search and Social Media Authority</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2017 01:36:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ruud Hein		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/16063-seo-google-changes.html/comment-page-1#comment-1067535</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ruud Hein]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2016 16:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com?p=63656&#038;preview_id=63656#comment-1067535</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/16063-seo-google-changes.html/comment-page-1#comment-1067486&quot;&gt;Mark D Worthen PsyD&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks Mark! Updated.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/16063-seo-google-changes.html/comment-page-1#comment-1067486" data-wpel-link="internal">Mark D Worthen PsyD</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks Mark! Updated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: H.T. Major		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/16063-seo-google-changes.html/comment-page-1#comment-1067488</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[H.T. Major]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jun 2016 04:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com?p=63656&#038;preview_id=63656#comment-1067488</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is great, Barrie, what a well-rounded article—I hadn&#039;t heard of RankBrain yet before. 

Honestly, I was still puzzled as to what it was after reading this... so I quickly googled and found that it may be the way Google interprets/matches listings to the searches that haven&#039;t used those exact keywords.

Interesting.

I&#039;d certainly noticed in recent months that Google was more intelligent, in terms of what it supposed people were searching for. But I didn&#039;t know that had a name. Thanks for the enlightenment. Yet another testament to the fact that &quot;exact match&quot; on-page SEO and keyword density are certainly no longer what they used to be.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is great, Barrie, what a well-rounded article—I hadn&#8217;t heard of RankBrain yet before. </p>
<p>Honestly, I was still puzzled as to what it was after reading this&#8230; so I quickly googled and found that it may be the way Google interprets/matches listings to the searches that haven&#8217;t used those exact keywords.</p>
<p>Interesting.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d certainly noticed in recent months that Google was more intelligent, in terms of what it supposed people were searching for. But I didn&#8217;t know that had a name. Thanks for the enlightenment. Yet another testament to the fact that &#8220;exact match&#8221; on-page SEO and keyword density are certainly no longer what they used to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark D Worthen PsyD		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/16063-seo-google-changes.html/comment-page-1#comment-1067486</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark D Worthen PsyD]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2016 23:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com?p=63656&#038;preview_id=63656#comment-1067486</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Broken link - the correct link to Google&#039;s Search Quality Ratings Guidelines is:

http://static.googleusercontent.com/media/www.google.com/en//insidesearch/howsearchworks/assets/searchqualityevaluatorguidelines.pdf

It&#039;s a tricky one. The correct link requires 2 forward slashes between &#039;en&#039; and &#039;insidesearch&#039; -

en//insidesearch]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Broken link &#8211; the correct link to Google&#8217;s Search Quality Ratings Guidelines is:</p>
<p><a href="http://static.googleusercontent.com/media/www.google.com/en//insidesearch/howsearchworks/assets/searchqualityevaluatorguidelines.pdf" rel="ugc nofollow external noopener noreferrer" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" class="ext-link">http://static.googleusercontent.com/media/www.google.com/en//insidesearch/howsearchworks/assets/searchqualityevaluatorguidelines.pdf</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s a tricky one. The correct link requires 2 forward slashes between &#8216;en&#8217; and &#8216;insidesearch&#8217; &#8211;</p>
<p>en//insidesearch</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
