<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 5 Link Building Techniques Google (Supposedly) Killed in 2013	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/5-link-building-techniques-google-supposedly-killed-in-2013.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/5-link-building-techniques-google-supposedly-killed-in-2013.html?utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s Search and Social Media Authority</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2017 01:53:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Alesia Krush		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/5-link-building-techniques-google-supposedly-killed-in-2013.html/comment-page-1#comment-587697</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alesia Krush]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Sep 2013 07:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=41382#comment-587697</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/5-link-building-techniques-google-supposedly-killed-in-2013.html/comment-page-1#comment-587453&quot;&gt;Anil Agarwal&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Anil,  

Thanks for commenting! 

Well, one can pay for a link to their site to be displayed on one of those screens at Times Square. This would be doing things solely for traffic, but Google couldn&#039;t care less in this case, since such links do not pass PageRank, nor do they affect one&#039;s rankings.

But you&#039;re right in saying that Google now wants to blacklist any marketing activity that also can be used as an SEO tactic, which I think is somewhat indiscriminate of Google, because not all marketers are SEO-savvy.

Cheers, 
Alesia]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/5-link-building-techniques-google-supposedly-killed-in-2013.html/comment-page-1#comment-587453" data-wpel-link="internal">Anil Agarwal</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Anil,  </p>
<p>Thanks for commenting! </p>
<p>Well, one can pay for a link to their site to be displayed on one of those screens at Times Square. This would be doing things solely for traffic, but Google couldn&#8217;t care less in this case, since such links do not pass PageRank, nor do they affect one&#8217;s rankings.</p>
<p>But you&#8217;re right in saying that Google now wants to blacklist any marketing activity that also can be used as an SEO tactic, which I think is somewhat indiscriminate of Google, because not all marketers are SEO-savvy.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Alesia</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anil Agarwal		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/5-link-building-techniques-google-supposedly-killed-in-2013.html/comment-page-1#comment-587453</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anil Agarwal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Sep 2013 12:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=41382#comment-587453</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think Google i going to blacklist every activity which is solely for the purpose of improving traffic to a website. If your doing are good for readers, Google bot will also love them.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Google i going to blacklist every activity which is solely for the purpose of improving traffic to a website. If your doing are good for readers, Google bot will also love them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
