<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Your Brand&#8217;s Google Autocomplete Reputation Is Evil [Fix This]	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/autocomplete-reputation-management.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/autocomplete-reputation-management.html?utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s Search and Social Media Authority</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 15:21:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Robert Koenig		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/autocomplete-reputation-management.html/comment-page-1#comment-228083</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Koenig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Oct 2012 23:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=30830#comment-228083</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great tips. Way back when Google autocomplete first premiered, it didn&#039;t seem like it would be much of an issue. Now, we see people going with whatever Google presents them while at the same time Google as made it harder and harder to rank highly.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great tips. Way back when Google autocomplete first premiered, it didn&#8217;t seem like it would be much of an issue. Now, we see people going with whatever Google presents them while at the same time Google as made it harder and harder to rank highly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
