<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: How to Get Backlinks Through Articles and Guest Blogging	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/backlinks-articles-blogging.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/backlinks-articles-blogging.html?utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s Search and Social Media Authority</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 15:40:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Denis		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/backlinks-articles-blogging.html/comment-page-1#comment-107870</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Denis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2011 15:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=11853#comment-107870</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So i should use keywords in an article asking questions.....so if for example i am looking to link the keywords courier services and delivery services what is the best way of going about it? I would really appreciate some advice, as i am trying to help our community with this website...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So i should use keywords in an article asking questions&#8230;..so if for example i am looking to link the keywords courier services and delivery services what is the best way of going about it? I would really appreciate some advice, as i am trying to help our community with this website&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Adam Riemer		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/backlinks-articles-blogging.html/comment-page-1#comment-59264</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Riemer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 22:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=11853#comment-59264</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(This is just my opinion).  Good SEO will have a mix of links from numerous sources and different types of sites (This is a very bold statement because some links are bad links and some sites are bad sites and you don&#039;t want them.  Bad sites and bad links are for a different post and topic though.)  It is true that authoritative sites in your particular niche with content rich and keyword rich backlinks are best for you, especially if you are the only link in that article and it is high up.  However, if that is all you have then it could be bad and you are limited to the amount of backlinks you will be able to have.  I am a firm believer in having a nice mix of links from good sites which includes a focus on many high quality links from sites within your niche.  Those high quality ones in your niche will be your most valuable, but the others won&#039;t always be a bad thing either.  Some people will probably disagree with that, at the same time that is why every SEO is different.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(This is just my opinion).  Good SEO will have a mix of links from numerous sources and different types of sites (This is a very bold statement because some links are bad links and some sites are bad sites and you don&#8217;t want them.  Bad sites and bad links are for a different post and topic though.)  It is true that authoritative sites in your particular niche with content rich and keyword rich backlinks are best for you, especially if you are the only link in that article and it is high up.  However, if that is all you have then it could be bad and you are limited to the amount of backlinks you will be able to have.  I am a firm believer in having a nice mix of links from good sites which includes a focus on many high quality links from sites within your niche.  Those high quality ones in your niche will be your most valuable, but the others won&#8217;t always be a bad thing either.  Some people will probably disagree with that, at the same time that is why every SEO is different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bob Tabor		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/backlinks-articles-blogging.html/comment-page-1#comment-59239</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob Tabor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 21:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=11853#comment-59239</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi, this article definitely caught my attention because it is a big goal for 2011 (i.e., publishing content on other sites for the link love).  I operate in the technology world, so my only question about the tactic above is: how does this jive with the notion that Google only awards &quot;votes&quot; to sites that are in the same &quot;neighborhood&quot; as my own?  For example, I suspect a vote from SearchEnginePeople.com would do a lot less for my SEO efforts than, say, 4GuysFromRolla.com, a popular article site for Microsoft software developers.  Or, is that an outmoded way of thinking about linking?

Great article!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, this article definitely caught my attention because it is a big goal for 2011 (i.e., publishing content on other sites for the link love).  I operate in the technology world, so my only question about the tactic above is: how does this jive with the notion that Google only awards &#8220;votes&#8221; to sites that are in the same &#8220;neighborhood&#8221; as my own?  For example, I suspect a vote from SearchEnginePeople.com would do a lot less for my SEO efforts than, say, 4GuysFromRolla.com, a popular article site for Microsoft software developers.  Or, is that an outmoded way of thinking about linking?</p>
<p>Great article!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Adam Riemer		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/backlinks-articles-blogging.html/comment-page-1#comment-59163</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Riemer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 16:50:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=11853#comment-59163</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/backlinks-articles-blogging.html/comment-page-1#comment-59140&quot;&gt;Mark Simon&lt;/a&gt;.

I agree, but some article sites have built communities out of them and when you connect with people there, they will often start to link to your articles or your sites from their articles without even telling you.  Many Article sites haven&#039;t built a community yet, but the ones that do are awesome because you can also find fellow Bloggers in your niche, etc...  I probably should have left this post about Guest Blogging instead.  

Thank you for your comments and its nice to meet you!

Adam]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/backlinks-articles-blogging.html/comment-page-1#comment-59140" data-wpel-link="internal">Mark Simon</a>.</p>
<p>I agree, but some article sites have built communities out of them and when you connect with people there, they will often start to link to your articles or your sites from their articles without even telling you.  Many Article sites haven&#8217;t built a community yet, but the ones that do are awesome because you can also find fellow Bloggers in your niche, etc&#8230;  I probably should have left this post about Guest Blogging instead.  </p>
<p>Thank you for your comments and its nice to meet you!</p>
<p>Adam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark Simon		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/backlinks-articles-blogging.html/comment-page-1#comment-59140</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Simon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 15:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=11853#comment-59140</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Adam,

Thanks for responding. I believe guest posting is one of the most beneficial offsite activities some one can do for their online marketing. Also, I completely agree that when you are transparent &#038; upfront from the beginning it is a win-win situation.

The one back link per root domain comment is directed primarily at article sites where there is not a loyal following. Popular blogs that are inline with your target market are definitely worth developing a relationship with both the site owner &#038; readers.

Thanks again for the great article.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Adam,</p>
<p>Thanks for responding. I believe guest posting is one of the most beneficial offsite activities some one can do for their online marketing. Also, I completely agree that when you are transparent &amp; upfront from the beginning it is a win-win situation.</p>
<p>The one back link per root domain comment is directed primarily at article sites where there is not a loyal following. Popular blogs that are inline with your target market are definitely worth developing a relationship with both the site owner &amp; readers.</p>
<p>Thanks again for the great article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Adam Riemer		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/backlinks-articles-blogging.html/comment-page-1#comment-58993</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam Riemer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 02:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=11853#comment-58993</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/backlinks-articles-blogging.html/comment-page-1#comment-58953&quot;&gt;Mark Simon&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Mark,

Not at all.  The point is to not be sneaky or deceptive but to add quality content for the readers and be able to tie your product in.  Maybe I wrote this incorrectly so let me explain a little more.  

With insurance, if you are guest Blogging for a Mommy Blog, write about 5 ways to lower total household costs.  One of those things can be shopping for a new insurance policy or combining policies with the same company to save money.  You could even do some research and give pointers on things to mention to lower the prices of current policies.  Normally the Mommy Blogger may link to a resource for each anyways so it would be a natural looking link, especially because it is.  That post will add value to their readers and also lets you pitch your product without it being all about a product pitch.  

Before I write the blog post for the blogs, I always let them know what company I am with and that I want the backlink of a particular term.  They get quality content that adds value to their readers and I get the link that I needed for my site.  It is a win win for both of us.  

I hope that clears it up a bit.  The point is to use your brain to think of a way to tie in your product and to add value to their readers without spamming the site or over pitching your own services.  

To your comment about only needing one backlink from the root domain, that is only part true.  Yes you have the backlink, but if it is a popular blog, you can also build a following and fan base there.  That fan base may then follow you to your site and help build up your own readership and get the word out about your site.  

I wish I could edit certain things in this post, like the spelling and grammar errors (I was sick when I wrote it), but I hope this clears up what I was trying to get across.  It is a great method that helps you to build up a following and get a legit backlink.  

Best,

Adam]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/backlinks-articles-blogging.html/comment-page-1#comment-58953" data-wpel-link="internal">Mark Simon</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Mark,</p>
<p>Not at all.  The point is to not be sneaky or deceptive but to add quality content for the readers and be able to tie your product in.  Maybe I wrote this incorrectly so let me explain a little more.  </p>
<p>With insurance, if you are guest Blogging for a Mommy Blog, write about 5 ways to lower total household costs.  One of those things can be shopping for a new insurance policy or combining policies with the same company to save money.  You could even do some research and give pointers on things to mention to lower the prices of current policies.  Normally the Mommy Blogger may link to a resource for each anyways so it would be a natural looking link, especially because it is.  That post will add value to their readers and also lets you pitch your product without it being all about a product pitch.  </p>
<p>Before I write the blog post for the blogs, I always let them know what company I am with and that I want the backlink of a particular term.  They get quality content that adds value to their readers and I get the link that I needed for my site.  It is a win win for both of us.  </p>
<p>I hope that clears it up a bit.  The point is to use your brain to think of a way to tie in your product and to add value to their readers without spamming the site or over pitching your own services.  </p>
<p>To your comment about only needing one backlink from the root domain, that is only part true.  Yes you have the backlink, but if it is a popular blog, you can also build a following and fan base there.  That fan base may then follow you to your site and help build up your own readership and get the word out about your site.  </p>
<p>I wish I could edit certain things in this post, like the spelling and grammar errors (I was sick when I wrote it), but I hope this clears up what I was trying to get across.  It is a great method that helps you to build up a following and get a legit backlink.  </p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Adam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark Simon		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/backlinks-articles-blogging.html/comment-page-1#comment-58953</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Simon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 00:24:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=11853#comment-58953</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I like your out of the box thinking on this. I suspect most blog owners would catch on to your sneaky tactic before publishing though. And article sites have a limited use in that you really only need one article on a site from a root domains perspective.

Have you gotten push back from blog owners using the tactics above?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your out of the box thinking on this. I suspect most blog owners would catch on to your sneaky tactic before publishing though. And article sites have a limited use in that you really only need one article on a site from a root domains perspective.</p>
<p>Have you gotten push back from blog owners using the tactics above?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
