<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The 4 Basic Areas Of SEO	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/basic-areas-seo.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/basic-areas-seo.html?utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s Search and Social Media Authority</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 06:16:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Kelly Clark		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/basic-areas-seo.html/comment-page-1#comment-181595</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kelly Clark]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 06:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=14282#comment-181595</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I am not sure how search engines will be able to measure the user data for a site without some type of tracking/analtyics loaded on it. I think other social ranking factors (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) are absolutely going to influence rankings and have already started to.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure how search engines will be able to measure the user data for a site without some type of tracking/analtyics loaded on it. I think other social ranking factors (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) are absolutely going to influence rankings and have already started to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/basic-areas-seo.html/comment-page-1#comment-74138</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 15:27:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=14282#comment-74138</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/basic-areas-seo.html/comment-page-1#comment-73367&quot;&gt;michael b.&lt;/a&gt;.

I am also confused on your nofollow point about internal links.  Matt Cutts posted a video answer saying nofollow was a waste of time for internals.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4SAPUx4Beh8]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/basic-areas-seo.html/comment-page-1#comment-73367" data-wpel-link="internal">michael b.</a>.</p>
<p>I am also confused on your nofollow point about internal links.  Matt Cutts posted a video answer saying nofollow was a waste of time for internals.<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4SAPUx4Beh8" rel="ugc nofollow external noopener noreferrer" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" class="ext-link">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4SAPUx4Beh8</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mark Collier		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/basic-areas-seo.html/comment-page-1#comment-73429</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark Collier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 10:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=14282#comment-73429</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/basic-areas-seo.html/comment-page-1#comment-73367&quot;&gt;michael b.&lt;/a&gt;.

It&#039;s about smart use of links and PageRank sculpting. Maybe you want to show people you have a privacy policy but you know it wont show up in the search engines. As a result you would use to nofollow tag for links pointing to the privacy policy. This would mean that the other search engine optimized pages would have more internally passed link juice and the privacy policy page would have less.

But the overall traffic benefit is positive as the privacy policy can still be found by users but as per normal can&#039;t be found in the search engines. And the other pages with additional link juice get more search engine traffic.

Hope that helps

Mark]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/basic-areas-seo.html/comment-page-1#comment-73367" data-wpel-link="internal">michael b.</a>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s about smart use of links and PageRank sculpting. Maybe you want to show people you have a privacy policy but you know it wont show up in the search engines. As a result you would use to nofollow tag for links pointing to the privacy policy. This would mean that the other search engine optimized pages would have more internally passed link juice and the privacy policy page would have less.</p>
<p>But the overall traffic benefit is positive as the privacy policy can still be found by users but as per normal can&#8217;t be found in the search engines. And the other pages with additional link juice get more search engine traffic.</p>
<p>Hope that helps</p>
<p>Mark</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: michael b.		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/basic-areas-seo.html/comment-page-1#comment-73367</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[michael b.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 22:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=14282#comment-73367</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;use of nofollow tag with internal links&quot;

Where does this fall within your on-page strategies?

It does not funnel more link juice to the remaining links on the page?

I struggle to find a reason why ppl would still employ the use of the no follow tag?

Where&#039;s the benefit?

Nice post.

-mb]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;use of nofollow tag with internal links&#8221;</p>
<p>Where does this fall within your on-page strategies?</p>
<p>It does not funnel more link juice to the remaining links on the page?</p>
<p>I struggle to find a reason why ppl would still employ the use of the no follow tag?</p>
<p>Where&#8217;s the benefit?</p>
<p>Nice post.</p>
<p>-mb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Snerdey Templates		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/basic-areas-seo.html/comment-page-1#comment-73304</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Snerdey Templates]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 10:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=14282#comment-73304</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Good stuff! Interesting how the Map and SEO bring everyone to the same table, same rules. Seams to be working out ok, too bad we don&#039;t have Human SEO. Well, actually there is one but it&#039;s in Japanese ;)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good stuff! Interesting how the Map and SEO bring everyone to the same table, same rules. Seams to be working out ok, too bad we don&#8217;t have Human SEO. Well, actually there is one but it&#8217;s in Japanese 😉</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kristi Hines		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/basic-areas-seo.html/comment-page-1#comment-73198</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kristi Hines]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 17:35:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=14282#comment-73198</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Looks like you covered all of the bases.  I like the visual map of how to judge link quality!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like you covered all of the bases.  I like the visual map of how to judge link quality!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
