<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 10 Ways To Beat The Panda Update	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/beat-panda-update.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/beat-panda-update.html?utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s Search and Social Media Authority</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:12:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jason Acidre		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/beat-panda-update.html/comment-page-1#comment-71785</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason Acidre]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 10:12:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=13919#comment-71785</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Excellent list Jan. I definitely agree with #6, I&#039;ve been testing social signals for quite some time now, and they are really influencing search results these days, but of course, it&#039;s imperative to know how to secure rankings once search engines begin to tag your fresh content as relevant to search phrases.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent list Jan. I definitely agree with #6, I&#8217;ve been testing social signals for quite some time now, and they are really influencing search results these days, but of course, it&#8217;s imperative to know how to secure rankings once search engines begin to tag your fresh content as relevant to search phrases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jan Willis		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/beat-panda-update.html/comment-page-1#comment-71684</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jan Willis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=13919#comment-71684</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/beat-panda-update.html/comment-page-1#comment-71649&quot;&gt;Wayne Barker&lt;/a&gt;.

Well said Wayne!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/beat-panda-update.html/comment-page-1#comment-71649" data-wpel-link="internal">Wayne Barker</a>.</p>
<p>Well said Wayne!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jan Willis		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/beat-panda-update.html/comment-page-1#comment-71683</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jan Willis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:48:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=13919#comment-71683</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/beat-panda-update.html/comment-page-1#comment-71631&quot;&gt;Dewaldt@Web Design&lt;/a&gt;.

Google have said that they will reward authority sites providing lots of valuable information such as research, in-depth reports and analysis so if you want to achieve high page rank you will need to have a number of lengthier keyword rich articles. The ideal length is 400 to 600 words.

Not all your posts need to be this long but if you have lots of very short posts the search engines may think your content is thin and penalise you, particularly if you have a lot of ads on your site. We don&#039;t yet know what the ideal ratio is but to be on the safe side I would balance things out by having at least one full length post to every 2 or 3 short posts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/beat-panda-update.html/comment-page-1#comment-71631" data-wpel-link="internal">Dewaldt@Web Design</a>.</p>
<p>Google have said that they will reward authority sites providing lots of valuable information such as research, in-depth reports and analysis so if you want to achieve high page rank you will need to have a number of lengthier keyword rich articles. The ideal length is 400 to 600 words.</p>
<p>Not all your posts need to be this long but if you have lots of very short posts the search engines may think your content is thin and penalise you, particularly if you have a lot of ads on your site. We don&#8217;t yet know what the ideal ratio is but to be on the safe side I would balance things out by having at least one full length post to every 2 or 3 short posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jan Willis		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/beat-panda-update.html/comment-page-1#comment-71681</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jan Willis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 16:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=13919#comment-71681</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/beat-panda-update.html/comment-page-1#comment-71664&quot;&gt;Wendy @ Executive Accessories&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Wendy
I don&#039;t think you need worry in this instance. Essentially you are not creating duplicate product descriptions but merely assigning a single description to multiple product categories using tags. Where you might run into problems is if you are using standard product descriptions and images provided by the manufacturer or third party reviews that a number of other retailers are also using. If that is the case you would be well advised to create your own unique content. Hope that helps!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/beat-panda-update.html/comment-page-1#comment-71664" data-wpel-link="internal">Wendy @ Executive Accessories</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Wendy<br />
I don&#8217;t think you need worry in this instance. Essentially you are not creating duplicate product descriptions but merely assigning a single description to multiple product categories using tags. Where you might run into problems is if you are using standard product descriptions and images provided by the manufacturer or third party reviews that a number of other retailers are also using. If that is the case you would be well advised to create your own unique content. Hope that helps!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Wendy @ Executive Accessories		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/beat-panda-update.html/comment-page-1#comment-71664</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wendy @ Executive Accessories]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 12:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=13919#comment-71664</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great article.  Thanks.
Just wondered Jan, with e-commerce sites where a product appears in more than one product category, is this duplicate content as far as Google is concerned and if so how do I get around it.  For example a particular tie on our website could be in the &quot;brand&quot; category for that tie, in &quot;silk ties&quot;, perhaps in &quot;skinny ties&quot; or &quot;wedding ties&quot;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article.  Thanks.<br />
Just wondered Jan, with e-commerce sites where a product appears in more than one product category, is this duplicate content as far as Google is concerned and if so how do I get around it.  For example a particular tie on our website could be in the &#8220;brand&#8221; category for that tie, in &#8220;silk ties&#8221;, perhaps in &#8220;skinny ties&#8221; or &#8220;wedding ties&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Wayne Barker		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/beat-panda-update.html/comment-page-1#comment-71649</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wayne Barker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 08:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=13919#comment-71649</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great post Jan,

I have been following the Panda update carefully and it has recently gone live in the UK with pretty much the same results as we saw in the States. Essentially it all comes down to the user experience. Google has harped on about it for years and it has been repeated by SEOs and Marketing guys for so long that we sometimes forget all about.
When you look at your site you have to ask yourself a few questions:
1. If I came here as a user would I be instantly turned off? Excessive and agressive ads certainly turn me off - stand up Ezine articles.
2. Do you provide real, unique and exciting content and information.
3. Do the content on you site warrant a place in the the first page of Google?
4. Will people return to find out other news or information or is this likely to be a one stop visit?
Your site needs to engage, inform and encourage repeat visits. It may be trivialising the hard work that ha gone into the latest Google update - but at the end of the day it was merely a clean up job. Google has swept away all the thin, lame and useless content and buried further down the results - allowing the better information more prominence.
If your site is genuine, if your information is great and unique, if you weren&#039;t firing out content to wrap adverts around...you should have little to worry about.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Jan,</p>
<p>I have been following the Panda update carefully and it has recently gone live in the UK with pretty much the same results as we saw in the States. Essentially it all comes down to the user experience. Google has harped on about it for years and it has been repeated by SEOs and Marketing guys for so long that we sometimes forget all about.<br />
When you look at your site you have to ask yourself a few questions:<br />
1. If I came here as a user would I be instantly turned off? Excessive and agressive ads certainly turn me off &#8211; stand up Ezine articles.<br />
2. Do you provide real, unique and exciting content and information.<br />
3. Do the content on you site warrant a place in the the first page of Google?<br />
4. Will people return to find out other news or information or is this likely to be a one stop visit?<br />
Your site needs to engage, inform and encourage repeat visits. It may be trivialising the hard work that ha gone into the latest Google update &#8211; but at the end of the day it was merely a clean up job. Google has swept away all the thin, lame and useless content and buried further down the results &#8211; allowing the better information more prominence.<br />
If your site is genuine, if your information is great and unique, if you weren&#8217;t firing out content to wrap adverts around&#8230;you should have little to worry about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dewaldt@Web Design		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/beat-panda-update.html/comment-page-1#comment-71631</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dewaldt@Web Design]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 04:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=13919#comment-71631</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[We have been hitted hard by Panda. Do you say a min word post should be at leats 400 words?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have been hitted hard by Panda. Do you say a min word post should be at leats 400 words?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jan Willis		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/beat-panda-update.html/comment-page-1#comment-71573</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jan Willis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 20:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=13919#comment-71573</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Google has sent out a very clear message that the days are numbered for people who game the Google algorithm to drive traffic to their sites but offer little or no original content and can&#039;t engage their visitors enough to get them to come back. Great content comes in many forms so blogging is by no means the be all and end all but for most people it will be the cornerstone of their content strategy - not least because Google loves fresh content and user interaction and blogging ticks both boxes. I also think social media will be a major beneficiary - in particular Youtube.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has sent out a very clear message that the days are numbered for people who game the Google algorithm to drive traffic to their sites but offer little or no original content and can&#8217;t engage their visitors enough to get them to come back. Great content comes in many forms so blogging is by no means the be all and end all but for most people it will be the cornerstone of their content strategy &#8211; not least because Google loves fresh content and user interaction and blogging ticks both boxes. I also think social media will be a major beneficiary &#8211; in particular Youtube.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jan Willis		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/beat-panda-update.html/comment-page-1#comment-71546</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jan Willis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 19:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=13919#comment-71546</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/beat-panda-update.html/comment-page-1#comment-71490&quot;&gt;Donna&lt;/a&gt;.

Great question Donna! Most of my clients have actually benefited from the changes because they have always focused on producing great original content.  There is only one that has been badly affected and having put a lot of effort into her blog and video marketing over the past month she has already undone most of the damage with her page rank and traffic recovering to near pre-Panda levels.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/beat-panda-update.html/comment-page-1#comment-71490" data-wpel-link="internal">Donna</a>.</p>
<p>Great question Donna! Most of my clients have actually benefited from the changes because they have always focused on producing great original content.  There is only one that has been badly affected and having put a lot of effort into her blog and video marketing over the past month she has already undone most of the damage with her page rank and traffic recovering to near pre-Panda levels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Wayne John @ Southern California Web Development		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/beat-panda-update.html/comment-page-1#comment-71498</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wayne John @ Southern California Web Development]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Apr 2011 16:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=13919#comment-71498</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s awesome...but what can thin sites do now?  lol  Start blogging?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s awesome&#8230;but what can thin sites do now?  lol  Start blogging?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
