<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Detailed Analysis of Semantic Search and its Role in Hummingbird Algorithm	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/detailed-analysis-of-semantic-search-and-its-role-in-hummingbird-algorithm.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/detailed-analysis-of-semantic-search-and-its-role-in-hummingbird-algorithm.html?utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s Search and Social Media Authority</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2017 01:52:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Brant		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/detailed-analysis-of-semantic-search-and-its-role-in-hummingbird-algorithm.html/comment-page-1#comment-637369</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brant]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Dec 2013 05:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=42678#comment-637369</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Not sure why there aren&#039;t any comments, but this article is spot on.  It confirms several thoughts I&#039;ve been having as I&#039;ve explored recent (and positive) A-typical ranking results we had for a local seo client.  Having broken some of my traditional keyword selection rules based on strong competition, I saw huge gains by incorporating 50% of 8 semantic factors I gleaned from a wikpedia article on the subject.  Anyway, I just wanted to say this is a great post and very timely.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure why there aren&#8217;t any comments, but this article is spot on.  It confirms several thoughts I&#8217;ve been having as I&#8217;ve explored recent (and positive) A-typical ranking results we had for a local seo client.  Having broken some of my traditional keyword selection rules based on strong competition, I saw huge gains by incorporating 50% of 8 semantic factors I gleaned from a wikpedia article on the subject.  Anyway, I just wanted to say this is a great post and very timely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
