Comments on: Distributed Link Building

By: stijn

stijn — Sun, 20 Dec 2009 16:43:25 +0000

I’d have to agree with Martokus and Vic. I understand the point of having level 1 and level 2 sites for a good link distribution. However, I would not recommend the usage of automated processes to gather links on a lot of link farms. If Google finds out (and they will!) it will only harm your rankings more than the potential benefit you can get out of it. By doing this manual (and in some countries this is easier than in others) you prevent yourself from getting blacklisted and thereby decreasing your positioning in Google.

If you’re not sure how to do this, google for natural linkbuilding blogs. They will tell you the trick, and maybe I will write a blog about it soon if you like. Furthermore, I agree with the link distribution, only not on having the process automated.

Stijn

By: vic

vic — Sun, 06 Dec 2009 12:46:26 +0000

Well Brandon,
Martokus already gave a smart comment.

I can’t believe that this semi black hat strategies are still working today. I don’t think this practice add much to your credibility and authority. I advice you to read the link development topics and comments on the Webmasterworld site for more high quality ideas and creativity.
Vic

By: Martokus

Martokus — Thu, 03 Dec 2009 15:46:15 +0000

Very nice but I have few questions:

1) The chances your link farm gets busted are quite high. This worked before but now… Different C class IPs, different whois, different DNS, different link paterns – nearly impossible to maintain for 200 sites. I don’t really believe you do this with your sites.

2) Your junk links would cause nice penalties of your level 2 and level 3 sites that you can them pass on to your level 1 site also. Again I cannot believe you actually practice this.

I look on this more like a post what’s possible and not like what’s really working.
.-= Martokus recently posted: martokus: That would be my next ringtone http://bit.ly/4LQRfT 😀 =-.