<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Two Simple and Effective SEO Plays that Increased My Rankings [SEO Starters]	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/effective-seo-plays.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/effective-seo-plays.html?utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s Search and Social Media Authority</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 14:21:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jon		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/effective-seo-plays.html/comment-page-1#comment-74136</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 15:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=14746#comment-74136</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great tips in internal linking. I try to internal link as I go now. With a newer site it is of course much harder as you have to back track once you have some content up. I have tried using tools (Wordpress plugins) in the past but these always just make a mess of things.

I think that one reason why it helps so much is because Google considers all your navigation as the &quot;boiler plate&quot; and possibly places less value on any links in those areas. The body of text is where the real juice is.

Thanks for writing about this, as I am sure I now need to go and look over some recent posts!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great tips in internal linking. I try to internal link as I go now. With a newer site it is of course much harder as you have to back track once you have some content up. I have tried using tools (WordPress plugins) in the past but these always just make a mess of things.</p>
<p>I think that one reason why it helps so much is because Google considers all your navigation as the &#8220;boiler plate&#8221; and possibly places less value on any links in those areas. The body of text is where the real juice is.</p>
<p>Thanks for writing about this, as I am sure I now need to go and look over some recent posts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
