<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Experiencing TouchGraph all over again	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/experiencing-touchgraph-all-over-again.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/experiencing-touchgraph-all-over-again.html?utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s Search and Social Media Authority</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 21:34:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: DazzlinDonna		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/experiencing-touchgraph-all-over-again.html/comment-page-1#comment-27686</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DazzlinDonna]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 21:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/04/06/experiencing-touchgraph-all-over-again/#comment-27686</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Actually, it pulls from Google&#039;s similar pages function, which basically lists sites that are either linked to the page, OR are listed on pages that are linked to the page.  I suppose there could be other reasons for related: sites showing up, but those are the ones I&#039;m most aware of.  So it&#039;s kind of a &quot;your neighbor is my neighbor&quot; thing, or maybe a 6 degrees of separation kind of thing.  In any case, however it is exactly calculated, yes, it can certainly be used to look for possible backlinks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, it pulls from Google&#8217;s similar pages function, which basically lists sites that are either linked to the page, OR are listed on pages that are linked to the page.  I suppose there could be other reasons for related: sites showing up, but those are the ones I&#8217;m most aware of.  So it&#8217;s kind of a &#8220;your neighbor is my neighbor&#8221; thing, or maybe a 6 degrees of separation kind of thing.  In any case, however it is exactly calculated, yes, it can certainly be used to look for possible backlinks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: robert paulson		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/experiencing-touchgraph-all-over-again.html/comment-page-1#comment-27685</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[robert paulson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 21:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/04/06/experiencing-touchgraph-all-over-again/#comment-27685</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I hadn&#039;t seen this before and gave it a whirl.  Pretty neat.

As I&#039;m understanding this, it does not reflect actual link relationships (but sometimes does), but rather reflects thematic similarities or contextual similarities.

So if I&#039;m correct with that assessment, I would think this might be a good tool to look for possible one-way IBLs.  Yes?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hadn&#8217;t seen this before and gave it a whirl.  Pretty neat.</p>
<p>As I&#8217;m understanding this, it does not reflect actual link relationships (but sometimes does), but rather reflects thematic similarities or contextual similarities.</p>
<p>So if I&#8217;m correct with that assessment, I would think this might be a good tool to look for possible one-way IBLs.  Yes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
