<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Five Things I&#8217;ve Learned About Paid Links	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/five-things-learned-about-paid-links.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/five-things-learned-about-paid-links.html?utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s Search and Social Media Authority</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 01:44:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: DJ		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/five-things-learned-about-paid-links.html/comment-page-1#comment-34844</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 19:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=6457#comment-34844</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yes I agree buying links can be a real problem.  I have seen major sites do extremely well purchasing high PR off topic links.  Takes them right to the top of Google for their keyword phrase and within a short time.  But you right sooner or later Google finds them and they get buried into the serps. So I guess in this instance &quot;Buyer Beware&quot;.  Cheers]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I agree buying links can be a real problem.  I have seen major sites do extremely well purchasing high PR off topic links.  Takes them right to the top of Google for their keyword phrase and within a short time.  But you right sooner or later Google finds them and they get buried into the serps. So I guess in this instance &#8220;Buyer Beware&#8221;.  Cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Steve		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/five-things-learned-about-paid-links.html/comment-page-1#comment-31293</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 22:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=6457#comment-31293</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Of course paid links work.  I love people that say avoid pages that say &quot;sponsored&quot;, footer links, obvious paid links, etc.  Those all still work too.  Either Google is gearing up for a big algo change that will stop a huge chunk of these or they just don&#039;t care anymore.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course paid links work.  I love people that say avoid pages that say &#8220;sponsored&#8221;, footer links, obvious paid links, etc.  Those all still work too.  Either Google is gearing up for a big algo change that will stop a huge chunk of these or they just don&#8217;t care anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: DonnyBoy		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/five-things-learned-about-paid-links.html/comment-page-1#comment-25107</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DonnyBoy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 00:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=6457#comment-25107</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Paid links work simple as that since 2001-2010 we have made over millions in sales almost touching 3 figures in millions close to 100million in sales and most of our links are paid. It just works simple as that and Google cannot fight against it all. Unless they decide to change the way they look at things]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paid links work simple as that since 2001-2010 we have made over millions in sales almost touching 3 figures in millions close to 100million in sales and most of our links are paid. It just works simple as that and Google cannot fight against it all. Unless they decide to change the way they look at things</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ally Wynne		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/five-things-learned-about-paid-links.html/comment-page-1#comment-24777</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ally Wynne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2010 19:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=6457#comment-24777</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Very interesting article, you have confirmed what I always suspected -- yes you can buy links and get some juice from them, but you had better be very careful about the sources.
.-= Ally Wynne recently posted: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wonderliftreview.com/?p=1&quot;&gt;Hello world!&lt;/a&gt; =-.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting article, you have confirmed what I always suspected &#8212; yes you can buy links and get some juice from them, but you had better be very careful about the sources.<br />
.-= Ally Wynne recently posted: <a href="http://www.wonderliftreview.com/?p=1" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="nofollow external noopener noreferrer" class="ext-link">Hello world!</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jacob maslow		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/five-things-learned-about-paid-links.html/comment-page-1#comment-24711</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jacob maslow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Aug 2010 18:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=6457#comment-24711</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/five-things-learned-about-paid-links.html/comment-page-1#comment-24451&quot;&gt;Andy @ FirstFound&lt;/a&gt;.

My competitor uses paid links. Links are manually placed, but he is buying it from an agency that sells links for lots of other clients so if any flags are raised, it is obvious that it is unnatural.

Anchor text is the biggest clue. Most people link without anchor text. Myself and our other competitors do not get much anchor text aside from articles in our own blogs, articles and other writings we do ourselves.

Agency uses lots of small blogs and places links for other clients on the same site. 

The competitor who buys links  has 181 domains linking to him with the anchor &quot;allergy relief&quot;. 147 domains linking with &quot;allergy bedding&quot; 72 domains with &quot;Allergy Mattress Covers&quot; anchor link.

I looked at a bunch of them. Each blog that i looked at had a quickie post of a single paragraph and was off-topic. They all also had anchor text with similar characteristics for weight loss pills, insurance and other sites. Nearly all had a boilerplate disclosure somewhere on the site that they accept compensation and may be influenced by it.

Other than the three phrases that this competitor targeted, they have no other anchor text (aside from their company name) from more than 3-4 domains. In other words each of these three phrases has dozens of anchor text links with desired text while no other phrases have more than 3 or 4.

They are getting some movement. They pulled this off by getting the links over time. 20-30 domains per month. Many of these domains arent crawled that often so a couple of new links per month is enough to crawl under the radar until it is discovered.

It looks like Google is checking newly crawled pages for red flags.

In totality, it looks obvious. Everyone else in the industry has few anchor text links. They are getting hundreds and by some odd coincidence all the bloggers linking to them are choosing one of these three phrases.

If 20 people were to link to you what are the odds that all 20 will use anchor text at all? The exact same text?

Once the red flag is raised and you take a closer look at the blogs linking out with the anchor text that is off topic, you see them doing so for lots of other sites and the full network is detected.

That is the biggest weakness, blog linking to you with paid anchor text of your choosing is doing so for others as well and more than likely working with some SEO firms.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/five-things-learned-about-paid-links.html/comment-page-1#comment-24451" data-wpel-link="internal">Andy @ FirstFound</a>.</p>
<p>My competitor uses paid links. Links are manually placed, but he is buying it from an agency that sells links for lots of other clients so if any flags are raised, it is obvious that it is unnatural.</p>
<p>Anchor text is the biggest clue. Most people link without anchor text. Myself and our other competitors do not get much anchor text aside from articles in our own blogs, articles and other writings we do ourselves.</p>
<p>Agency uses lots of small blogs and places links for other clients on the same site. </p>
<p>The competitor who buys links  has 181 domains linking to him with the anchor &#8220;allergy relief&#8221;. 147 domains linking with &#8220;allergy bedding&#8221; 72 domains with &#8220;Allergy Mattress Covers&#8221; anchor link.</p>
<p>I looked at a bunch of them. Each blog that i looked at had a quickie post of a single paragraph and was off-topic. They all also had anchor text with similar characteristics for weight loss pills, insurance and other sites. Nearly all had a boilerplate disclosure somewhere on the site that they accept compensation and may be influenced by it.</p>
<p>Other than the three phrases that this competitor targeted, they have no other anchor text (aside from their company name) from more than 3-4 domains. In other words each of these three phrases has dozens of anchor text links with desired text while no other phrases have more than 3 or 4.</p>
<p>They are getting some movement. They pulled this off by getting the links over time. 20-30 domains per month. Many of these domains arent crawled that often so a couple of new links per month is enough to crawl under the radar until it is discovered.</p>
<p>It looks like Google is checking newly crawled pages for red flags.</p>
<p>In totality, it looks obvious. Everyone else in the industry has few anchor text links. They are getting hundreds and by some odd coincidence all the bloggers linking to them are choosing one of these three phrases.</p>
<p>If 20 people were to link to you what are the odds that all 20 will use anchor text at all? The exact same text?</p>
<p>Once the red flag is raised and you take a closer look at the blogs linking out with the anchor text that is off topic, you see them doing so for lots of other sites and the full network is detected.</p>
<p>That is the biggest weakness, blog linking to you with paid anchor text of your choosing is doing so for others as well and more than likely working with some SEO firms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Cheryl Jones		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/five-things-learned-about-paid-links.html/comment-page-1#comment-24626</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cheryl Jones]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 02:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=6457#comment-24626</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Melanie,

You made a lot of good points.  I think that is obvious that links are not &quot;organic&quot;or &quot;natural&quot; when the links come from sources that are irrelevant to the topic at hand.  I know I have had many links to my blog I have had to get rid of as spam.
.-= Cheryl Jones recently posted: &lt;a href=&quot;http://marketingwithcheryl.com/thank-you-to-my-visitors/&quot;&gt;Thank you to my visitors&lt;/a&gt; =-.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Melanie,</p>
<p>You made a lot of good points.  I think that is obvious that links are not &#8220;organic&#8221;or &#8220;natural&#8221; when the links come from sources that are irrelevant to the topic at hand.  I know I have had many links to my blog I have had to get rid of as spam.<br />
.-= Cheryl Jones recently posted: <a href="http://marketingwithcheryl.com/thank-you-to-my-visitors/" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="nofollow external noopener noreferrer" class="ext-link">Thank you to my visitors</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jayesh		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/five-things-learned-about-paid-links.html/comment-page-1#comment-24593</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jayesh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 10:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=6457#comment-24593</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Melaine
Thanks for such an interesting post.
I know that paid links can hurt but what about less relevant links? and if it is from high pr sites?
please reply as i am a bit worried as i do practice that a little (Although i do take care of relevancy but some time i go for the link event if it is not related but from high pr site)
Highly appreciate your reply]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Melaine<br />
Thanks for such an interesting post.<br />
I know that paid links can hurt but what about less relevant links? and if it is from high pr sites?<br />
please reply as i am a bit worried as i do practice that a little (Although i do take care of relevancy but some time i go for the link event if it is not related but from high pr site)<br />
Highly appreciate your reply</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: James		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/five-things-learned-about-paid-links.html/comment-page-1#comment-24509</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 22:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=6457#comment-24509</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for sharing your observations. I agree paid link juice is rarely worth the squeeze, but your point about donating to .edu&#039;s was very interesting and worth considering for many organizations.
.-= James recently posted: &lt;a href=&quot;http://jamesfranciswhite.com/2010/08/so-what-can-a-small-business-do-with-social-media-anyway/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;So- what can a small business do with social media- anyway&lt;/a&gt; =-.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing your observations. I agree paid link juice is rarely worth the squeeze, but your point about donating to .edu&#8217;s was very interesting and worth considering for many organizations.<br />
.-= James recently posted: <a href="http://jamesfranciswhite.com/2010/08/so-what-can-a-small-business-do-with-social-media-anyway/" rel="nofollow external noopener noreferrer" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" class="ext-link">So- what can a small business do with social media- anyway</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Afam orji		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/five-things-learned-about-paid-links.html/comment-page-1#comment-24508</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Afam orji]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 18:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=6457#comment-24508</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[BY paid links do you mean Adwords?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BY paid links do you mean Adwords?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Funkf00t		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/five-things-learned-about-paid-links.html/comment-page-1#comment-24496</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Funkf00t]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 14:31:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=6457#comment-24496</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Aren&#039;t links going the way of the dodo? Couldn&#039;t the industry put the effort in devising a less imperfect way of measuring &#039;relevance&#039;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aren&#8217;t links going the way of the dodo? Couldn&#8217;t the industry put the effort in devising a less imperfect way of measuring &#8216;relevance&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
