<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Google Captures Less Than 10% Additional Search In 3 Years	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-captures-less-than-10-additional-search-in-3-years.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-captures-less-than-10-additional-search-in-3-years.html?utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s Search and Social Media Authority</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 12:12:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ruud Hein		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-captures-less-than-10-additional-search-in-3-years.html/comment-page-1#comment-51928</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ruud Hein]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 12:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-captures-less-than-10-additional-search-in-3-years.html#comment-51928</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-captures-less-than-10-additional-search-in-3-years.html/comment-page-1#comment-51867&quot;&gt;Karn@SEO Business Box&lt;/a&gt;.

You guessed correctly, Karn. Thanks for dropping by!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-captures-less-than-10-additional-search-in-3-years.html/comment-page-1#comment-51867" data-wpel-link="internal">Karn@SEO Business Box</a>.</p>
<p>You guessed correctly, Karn. Thanks for dropping by!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ruud Hein		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-captures-less-than-10-additional-search-in-3-years.html/comment-page-1#comment-51927</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ruud Hein]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 12:11:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-captures-less-than-10-additional-search-in-3-years.html#comment-51927</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-captures-less-than-10-additional-search-in-3-years.html/comment-page-1#comment-51902&quot;&gt;Craig&lt;/a&gt;.

Undoubtedly true, Craig. But maybe down the line &lt;i&gt;which&lt;/i&gt; search engine would reign supreme would change?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-captures-less-than-10-additional-search-in-3-years.html/comment-page-1#comment-51902" data-wpel-link="internal">Craig</a>.</p>
<p>Undoubtedly true, Craig. But maybe down the line <i>which</i> search engine would reign supreme would change?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ruud Hein		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-captures-less-than-10-additional-search-in-3-years.html/comment-page-1#comment-51926</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ruud Hein]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 12:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-captures-less-than-10-additional-search-in-3-years.html#comment-51926</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-captures-less-than-10-additional-search-in-3-years.html/comment-page-1#comment-51925&quot;&gt;Val @ Web Tracking Guide&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks for the comment, Val. Good points too.

Also, the way users from a specific search engine interact with your site can be different at times. That can make it interesting to talk to those people more directly or to adapt your pages, on the fly, to their click patterns.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-captures-less-than-10-additional-search-in-3-years.html/comment-page-1#comment-51925" data-wpel-link="internal">Val @ Web Tracking Guide</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment, Val. Good points too.</p>
<p>Also, the way users from a specific search engine interact with your site can be different at times. That can make it interesting to talk to those people more directly or to adapt your pages, on the fly, to their click patterns.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Val @ Web Tracking Guide		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-captures-less-than-10-additional-search-in-3-years.html/comment-page-1#comment-51925</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Val @ Web Tracking Guide]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 11:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-captures-less-than-10-additional-search-in-3-years.html#comment-51925</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I guess at some point it becomes difficult to capture another 1% of the market.

It is true that you can find better advertising deals on smaller search engines. Fewer people advertise there, so there is less competition. However, there are a few caveats.

First, to justify the campaign administration overhead, you have to use more keywords, including the less targeted, more popular ones. This may not be for everyone.

Second, click fraud detection may not be as effective as Google&#039;s, because of lower traffic, among other reasons. So you better have additional click fraud monitoring on your side.

If your advertising budget and keywords range allow you to do that, then advertising on alternative search engines can indeed be very profitable.
.-= Val @ Web Tracking Guide recently posted: &lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/WebTrackingBlog/~3/J6NKNLaijug/&quot;&gt;How to Use Tracking to Get More Daily Readers&lt;/a&gt; =-.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess at some point it becomes difficult to capture another 1% of the market.</p>
<p>It is true that you can find better advertising deals on smaller search engines. Fewer people advertise there, so there is less competition. However, there are a few caveats.</p>
<p>First, to justify the campaign administration overhead, you have to use more keywords, including the less targeted, more popular ones. This may not be for everyone.</p>
<p>Second, click fraud detection may not be as effective as Google&#8217;s, because of lower traffic, among other reasons. So you better have additional click fraud monitoring on your side.</p>
<p>If your advertising budget and keywords range allow you to do that, then advertising on alternative search engines can indeed be very profitable.<br />
.-= Val @ Web Tracking Guide recently posted: <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/WebTrackingBlog/~3/J6NKNLaijug/" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="nofollow external noopener noreferrer" class="ext-link">How to Use Tracking to Get More Daily Readers</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Craig		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-captures-less-than-10-additional-search-in-3-years.html/comment-page-1#comment-51902</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Craig]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 07:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-captures-less-than-10-additional-search-in-3-years.html#comment-51902</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I tend to think it&#039;s a minor blip; caused by internet growth having peaked in most OECD countries over the past few years.

Search engine traffic will always reign supreme, whether it be Google or other providors. The whole Facebook thing is just the latest, greatest thing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to think it&#8217;s a minor blip; caused by internet growth having peaked in most OECD countries over the past few years.</p>
<p>Search engine traffic will always reign supreme, whether it be Google or other providors. The whole Facebook thing is just the latest, greatest thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Karn@SEO Business Box		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-captures-less-than-10-additional-search-in-3-years.html/comment-page-1#comment-51867</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karn@SEO Business Box]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 02:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-captures-less-than-10-additional-search-in-3-years.html#comment-51867</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It is so interesting to know that Google only has 2/3&#039;s of the market share.

Am I guessing correctly that the other 33% would be shared between Yahoo, Bing and other search engines?

I would love to know the Global stats, aside from the US.

Thanks for the great read.
.-= Karn@SEO Business Box recently posted: &lt;a href=&quot;http://seobusinessboxx.net/seo-business-box/seo-business-box-review-2/&quot;&gt;SEO Business Box Review&lt;/a&gt; =-.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is so interesting to know that Google only has 2/3&#8217;s of the market share.</p>
<p>Am I guessing correctly that the other 33% would be shared between Yahoo, Bing and other search engines?</p>
<p>I would love to know the Global stats, aside from the US.</p>
<p>Thanks for the great read.<br />
.-= Karn@SEO Business Box recently posted: <a href="http://seobusinessboxx.net/seo-business-box/seo-business-box-review-2/" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="nofollow external noopener noreferrer" class="ext-link">SEO Business Box Review</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
