<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Google is broken theory	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-is-broken-theory.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-is-broken-theory.html?utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s Search and Social Media Authority</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 09:06:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: jessica		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-is-broken-theory.html/comment-page-1#comment-27022</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jessica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jul 2006 09:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scoop.com/2006/06/30/google-is-broken-theory/#comment-27022</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Well, Google&#039;s stand is very apparent from its wicked intentions. Google&#039;s sole aim is to earn revenue with relevancy lost in the graveyard..

I have found a site http://www.organicspam.com that has impressed me with its motive and content. They have openly raised sword against Google. Will have to say that this is definitely a bold move]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Google&#8217;s stand is very apparent from its wicked intentions. Google&#8217;s sole aim is to earn revenue with relevancy lost in the graveyard..</p>
<p>I have found a site <a href="http://www.organicspam.com" rel="ugc nofollow external noopener noreferrer" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" class="ext-link">http://www.organicspam.com</a> that has impressed me with its motive and content. They have openly raised sword against Google. Will have to say that this is definitely a bold move</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SEFL		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-is-broken-theory.html/comment-page-1#comment-27021</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SEFL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2006 13:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scoop.com/2006/06/30/google-is-broken-theory/#comment-27021</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[* sighs *

The problem with his whole theory is that he makes the exact same mistake every other &quot;Google is broken&quot; theorist makes...he uses his own site, and only his own site, as the sole judge of relevancy.  &quot;&lt;b&gt;My&lt;/b&gt; site is the most relevant because...&quot;

He&#039;s attempting to apply subjective thinking to objective logic.  Whether or not anyone agrees with him is completely immaterial.

There&#039;s also the fact that he&#039;s running completely irrelevant links down at the bottom of vbulletin-faq.com itself.  Like it or not, it&#039;s something Big G is busting on, and he probably got caught and doesn&#039;t want to admit it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>* sighs *</p>
<p>The problem with his whole theory is that he makes the exact same mistake every other &#8220;Google is broken&#8221; theorist makes&#8230;he uses his own site, and only his own site, as the sole judge of relevancy.  &#8220;<b>My</b> site is the most relevant because&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>He&#8217;s attempting to apply subjective thinking to objective logic.  Whether or not anyone agrees with him is completely immaterial.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s also the fact that he&#8217;s running completely irrelevant links down at the bottom of vbulletin-faq.com itself.  Like it or not, it&#8217;s something Big G is busting on, and he probably got caught and doesn&#8217;t want to admit it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
