<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Google Search Does A Half-baked Job	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-search-does-a-half-baked-job.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-search-does-a-half-baked-job.html?utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s Search and Social Media Authority</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 18:33:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Barry Welford		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-search-does-a-half-baked-job.html/comment-page-1#comment-16446</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Barry Welford]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 18:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=5504#comment-16446</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s an excellent question, Ligurien Guy, and perhaps Roy Paeth has suggested the answer.

Google will handle purely logical stuff well by algorithmic methods.  That may be say 40% of what the Internet population is interested in.  Even there they will have problems since spam article writers can fool the algorithms.

For other websites, where the other brains (heart, gut) are involved, then you probably need to involve social media in some way and get the people involved.  If Google wanted to help, it would certainly know from its analytics that visitors act &quot;irrationally&quot; on certain pages as per what their algorithms are telling them.  In those cases, Google might indicate by a quality score for its algorithm that their evaluation is weak.  However that&#039;s probably too much truth for Google to reveal.
.-= Barry Welford recently posted: &lt;a href=&quot;http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/bpwrap/~3/ZnOQIdF8QiE/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Stop Sending Junk E-Mail&lt;/a&gt; =-.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s an excellent question, Ligurien Guy, and perhaps Roy Paeth has suggested the answer.</p>
<p>Google will handle purely logical stuff well by algorithmic methods.  That may be say 40% of what the Internet population is interested in.  Even there they will have problems since spam article writers can fool the algorithms.</p>
<p>For other websites, where the other brains (heart, gut) are involved, then you probably need to involve social media in some way and get the people involved.  If Google wanted to help, it would certainly know from its analytics that visitors act &#8220;irrationally&#8221; on certain pages as per what their algorithms are telling them.  In those cases, Google might indicate by a quality score for its algorithm that their evaluation is weak.  However that&#8217;s probably too much truth for Google to reveal.<br />
.-= Barry Welford recently posted: <a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/bpwrap/~3/ZnOQIdF8QiE/" rel="nofollow external noopener noreferrer" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" class="ext-link">Stop Sending Junk E-Mail</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ligurien Guy		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-search-does-a-half-baked-job.html/comment-page-1#comment-14959</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ligurien Guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 21:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=5504#comment-14959</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What alternative do you want to suggest instead of Google?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What alternative do you want to suggest instead of Google?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Roy Paeth		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-search-does-a-half-baked-job.html/comment-page-1#comment-14932</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Paeth]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 05:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=5504#comment-14932</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Good article Barry. I find it amazing how much goes into making sure I get relevant sites when I am searching for something on Google. I think there may be a plateau at some point where Google just cannot get any better.

Roy Paeth - &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chicagolandmortgagesolutions.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Chicago First Time Buyer&lt;/A&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article Barry. I find it amazing how much goes into making sure I get relevant sites when I am searching for something on Google. I think there may be a plateau at some point where Google just cannot get any better.</p>
<p>Roy Paeth &#8211; <a href="http://www.chicagolandmortgagesolutions.com" rel="nofollow external noopener noreferrer" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" class="ext-link">Chicago First Time Buyer</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
