<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Google Shows Multiple Listing for One Site [+ How To Get Them Checklist]	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-shows-multiple-listing-for-one-site-how-to-get-them-checklist.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-shows-multiple-listing-for-one-site-how-to-get-them-checklist.html?utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s Search and Social Media Authority</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 01:18:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Phil		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-shows-multiple-listing-for-one-site-how-to-get-them-checklist.html/comment-page-1#comment-210151</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Phil]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 04:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=6677#comment-210151</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Totally agree with Paul - Google is making the internet viable only for big corps. The internet was meant to be a media for all. Most small companies won&#039;t stand a chance of getting a top 20 listing now. I spoke to Google UK and was told &quot;if the minority of sites loose out or go under because of it so be it. It will benefit the majority&quot; They are far too big for their boots and need to brought back inline. Please someone start a new decent engine]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree with Paul &#8211; Google is making the internet viable only for big corps. The internet was meant to be a media for all. Most small companies won&#8217;t stand a chance of getting a top 20 listing now. I spoke to Google UK and was told &#8220;if the minority of sites loose out or go under because of it so be it. It will benefit the majority&#8221; They are far too big for their boots and need to brought back inline. Please someone start a new decent engine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Paul		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-shows-multiple-listing-for-one-site-how-to-get-them-checklist.html/comment-page-1#comment-74259</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 May 2011 17:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=6677#comment-74259</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is the stupidest thing EVER! what about the people who used to be number two or three, but now are at the bottom of the page , or on page two? How does his help sites or webmasters? Sure if you&#039;re number one, great, but if your not, then you&#039;re screwed. Unless of course you want to spend more money on Adwords, which is exactly what I think google has done this for. To increase the need to use adwords. - Don&#039;t fool yourself and think this is t benefit the user, it&#039;s all about google making money,]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the stupidest thing EVER! what about the people who used to be number two or three, but now are at the bottom of the page , or on page two? How does his help sites or webmasters? Sure if you&#8217;re number one, great, but if your not, then you&#8217;re screwed. Unless of course you want to spend more money on Adwords, which is exactly what I think google has done this for. To increase the need to use adwords. &#8211; Don&#8217;t fool yourself and think this is t benefit the user, it&#8217;s all about google making money,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
