<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Understanding the Updated URL Parameter Handling in Google&#8217;s Webmaster Tools	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-url-parametert-tool.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-url-parametert-tool.html?utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s Search and Social Media Authority</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 15:44:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Kris S		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-url-parametert-tool.html/comment-page-1#comment-156412</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kris S]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 18:40:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=19048#comment-156412</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-url-parametert-tool.html/comment-page-1#comment-156396&quot;&gt;Joe&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Joe,

That&#039;s a great question.  There are many sites, particularly with wordpress, that load scripts, images, includes and a number of other files often using variables.  The answer however is not a simple yes or no, but would depend on the content you&#039;re loading.

Some ways you can determine this would be to take the url (with parameters), view it in your browser and ask:

- Is there content showing that you want indexed?
- Is the content unique, or is the parameter something that does not change the content?  In which case you may have a cleaner url to index.

An example of where it might be loading something you wouldn&#039;t want to block would be an iframe loading unique content.  For your specific examples of h, w and src they&#039;re likely something to do with height and width which won&#039;t change the unique content but rather the layout.  If you try the quick test above you&#039;ll have a confident answer.

For most cases with theme files, functions, plugins, and the like they simply add functionality and blocking them from the index won&#039;t affect your content.  It&#039;s important however to ensure that other content that you do want to be indexed does not use the same variable. 

If you&#039;re unsure it&#039;s generally better to leave it to &#039;let google decide&#039; and they&#039;ll index any relevant unique content.

Hope that helps,

Kris]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-url-parametert-tool.html/comment-page-1#comment-156396" data-wpel-link="internal">Joe</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Joe,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a great question.  There are many sites, particularly with wordpress, that load scripts, images, includes and a number of other files often using variables.  The answer however is not a simple yes or no, but would depend on the content you&#8217;re loading.</p>
<p>Some ways you can determine this would be to take the url (with parameters), view it in your browser and ask:</p>
<p>&#8211; Is there content showing that you want indexed?<br />
&#8211; Is the content unique, or is the parameter something that does not change the content?  In which case you may have a cleaner url to index.</p>
<p>An example of where it might be loading something you wouldn&#8217;t want to block would be an iframe loading unique content.  For your specific examples of h, w and src they&#8217;re likely something to do with height and width which won&#8217;t change the unique content but rather the layout.  If you try the quick test above you&#8217;ll have a confident answer.</p>
<p>For most cases with theme files, functions, plugins, and the like they simply add functionality and blocking them from the index won&#8217;t affect your content.  It&#8217;s important however to ensure that other content that you do want to be indexed does not use the same variable. </p>
<p>If you&#8217;re unsure it&#8217;s generally better to leave it to &#8216;let google decide&#8217; and they&#8217;ll index any relevant unique content.</p>
<p>Hope that helps,</p>
<p>Kris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Joe		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-url-parametert-tool.html/comment-page-1#comment-156396</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=19048#comment-156396</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What about parameters that are part of a file such as part of an image file or theme file. I see a lot of parameters in there that are part of my theme files and I&#039;m not sure if I should be blocking them or not. The parameters in question are: &quot;h&quot;, &quot;w&quot;, &quot;src&quot;, etc.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about parameters that are part of a file such as part of an image file or theme file. I see a lot of parameters in there that are part of my theme files and I&#8217;m not sure if I should be blocking them or not. The parameters in question are: &#8220;h&#8221;, &#8220;w&#8221;, &#8220;src&#8221;, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
