<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Google Webmaster Tools Sitemap Verification Troubles	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-webmaster-tools-sitemap-verification-troubles.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-webmaster-tools-sitemap-verification-troubles.html?utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s Search and Social Media Authority</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 04:56:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: GeoffreyF67		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/google-webmaster-tools-sitemap-verification-troubles.html/comment-page-1#comment-27466</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GeoffreyF67]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 04:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scoop.com/2006/12/13/google-webmaster-tools-sitemap-verification-troubles/#comment-27466</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The sitemap seemed to be more trouble than it was worth.  I do like the other webmaster tools though and since I&#039;ve found out that the list of links in the sitemap is inclusive and not exclusive (if it&#039;s not in there that doesn&#039;t mean your page won&#039;t be crawled) then it seems like it may be worth mucking about with in the future :)

Hmmm...I&#039;m tired and that sentence above isn&#039;t making much sense...the short answer is - no, it won&#039;t affect your ranking or cause any other problems.

G-Man]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The sitemap seemed to be more trouble than it was worth.  I do like the other webmaster tools though and since I&#8217;ve found out that the list of links in the sitemap is inclusive and not exclusive (if it&#8217;s not in there that doesn&#8217;t mean your page won&#8217;t be crawled) then it seems like it may be worth mucking about with in the future 🙂</p>
<p>Hmmm&#8230;I&#8217;m tired and that sentence above isn&#8217;t making much sense&#8230;the short answer is &#8211; no, it won&#8217;t affect your ranking or cause any other problems.</p>
<p>G-Man</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
