<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: How To Not Make The Mistake 15 Million Posterous Bloggers Made With 63 Million Pages	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/how-to-not-make-the-mistake-15-million-posterous-bloggers-made-with-63-million-pages.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/how-to-not-make-the-mistake-15-million-posterous-bloggers-made-with-63-million-pages.html?utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s Search and Social Media Authority</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2020 00:14:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Scott Hopkins		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/how-to-not-make-the-mistake-15-million-posterous-bloggers-made-with-63-million-pages.html/comment-page-1#comment-270582</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Hopkins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 04:36:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=34947#comment-270582</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I followed this article from a recent Copyblogger link about Google+ authorship... I have to say, I agree 100% and cannot imagine investing too much in one of these services. I run a handful of blogs to cater to several different interests. One of the most minor ones is on Blogger. I have faith in this system because Google runs it but, it is risky to have my site over there. Thus I have made it my least interesting and the one that requires the least amount of work. I am also doing it to test the success of a particular blog as far as SERPs are concerned, given it is using the platform and on-page SEO Google loves.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I followed this article from a recent Copyblogger link about Google+ authorship&#8230; I have to say, I agree 100% and cannot imagine investing too much in one of these services. I run a handful of blogs to cater to several different interests. One of the most minor ones is on Blogger. I have faith in this system because Google runs it but, it is risky to have my site over there. Thus I have made it my least interesting and the one that requires the least amount of work. I am also doing it to test the success of a particular blog as far as SERPs are concerned, given it is using the platform and on-page SEO Google loves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ruud Hein		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/how-to-not-make-the-mistake-15-million-posterous-bloggers-made-with-63-million-pages.html/comment-page-1#comment-268181</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ruud Hein]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=34947#comment-268181</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/how-to-not-make-the-mistake-15-million-posterous-bloggers-made-with-63-million-pages.html/comment-page-1#comment-267966&quot;&gt;Michael Martinez&lt;/a&gt;.

I hear what you&#039;re saying -- and it&#039;s a fair bit of realism -- but I don&#039;t think it invalidates the case of pushing best practices. 

If a client wants to &lt;i&gt;also&lt;/i&gt; have a &lt;i&gt;presence&lt;/i&gt; on Tumblr; fine, awesome, go for it. If they want their blog to be ourbrand.tumblr.com -- I&#039;ll advise against it without hesitation.

And if they&#039;re not a client? Then still! I rather be in the &quot;I told you so&quot; position when a blogger loses content, income, ranking, authority, or all of the above, than be on the end of &quot;hell, why didn&#039;t you tell me?!&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/how-to-not-make-the-mistake-15-million-posterous-bloggers-made-with-63-million-pages.html/comment-page-1#comment-267966" data-wpel-link="internal">Michael Martinez</a>.</p>
<p>I hear what you&#8217;re saying &#8212; and it&#8217;s a fair bit of realism &#8212; but I don&#8217;t think it invalidates the case of pushing best practices. </p>
<p>If a client wants to <i>also</i> have a <i>presence</i> on Tumblr; fine, awesome, go for it. If they want their blog to be ourbrand.tumblr.com &#8212; I&#8217;ll advise against it without hesitation.</p>
<p>And if they&#8217;re not a client? Then still! I rather be in the &#8220;I told you so&#8221; position when a blogger loses content, income, ranking, authority, or all of the above, than be on the end of &#8220;hell, why didn&#8217;t you tell me?!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Michael Martinez		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/how-to-not-make-the-mistake-15-million-posterous-bloggers-made-with-63-million-pages.html/comment-page-1#comment-267966</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Martinez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2013 00:29:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=34947#comment-267966</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/how-to-not-make-the-mistake-15-million-posterous-bloggers-made-with-63-million-pages.html/comment-page-1#comment-267852&quot;&gt;Michael Martinez&lt;/a&gt;.

Most active Websites are on subdomains.  That&#039;s just the way the Web works.  It&#039;s pointless to argue with people about whether they should register their own domains.  That&#039;s just not going to happen in most cases.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/how-to-not-make-the-mistake-15-million-posterous-bloggers-made-with-63-million-pages.html/comment-page-1#comment-267852" data-wpel-link="internal">Michael Martinez</a>.</p>
<p>Most active Websites are on subdomains.  That&#8217;s just the way the Web works.  It&#8217;s pointless to argue with people about whether they should register their own domains.  That&#8217;s just not going to happen in most cases.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom Jamieson		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/how-to-not-make-the-mistake-15-million-posterous-bloggers-made-with-63-million-pages.html/comment-page-1#comment-267883</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Jamieson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=34947#comment-267883</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sad to hear this news about Posterous.  While I didn&#039;t use it for my primary blog or content, it was nice to have it as a sideblog for fun stuff.  Oh well, as they say in sports, &quot;Next man up!&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sad to hear this news about Posterous.  While I didn&#8217;t use it for my primary blog or content, it was nice to have it as a sideblog for fun stuff.  Oh well, as they say in sports, &#8220;Next man up!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ruud Hein		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/how-to-not-make-the-mistake-15-million-posterous-bloggers-made-with-63-million-pages.html/comment-page-1#comment-267874</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ruud Hein]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 19:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=34947#comment-267874</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/how-to-not-make-the-mistake-15-million-posterous-bloggers-made-with-63-million-pages.html/comment-page-1#comment-267852&quot;&gt;Michael Martinez&lt;/a&gt;.

nice but not &lt;em&gt;that&lt;/em&gt; important? Write good content, get it ranked. Have people reference it, quote it, copy it. Take your own content down; put it up somewhere else. No redirect. Google now thinks &lt;i&gt;the other stuff&lt;/i&gt; is real and yours is fake.

But yes -- we all have to use some sort of third party. But not owning your content&#039;s location -- really not a good idea.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/how-to-not-make-the-mistake-15-million-posterous-bloggers-made-with-63-million-pages.html/comment-page-1#comment-267852" data-wpel-link="internal">Michael Martinez</a>.</p>
<p>nice but not <em>that</em> important? Write good content, get it ranked. Have people reference it, quote it, copy it. Take your own content down; put it up somewhere else. No redirect. Google now thinks <i>the other stuff</i> is real and yours is fake.</p>
<p>But yes &#8212; we all have to use some sort of third party. But not owning your content&#8217;s location &#8212; really not a good idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Purbita Ditecha		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/how-to-not-make-the-mistake-15-million-posterous-bloggers-made-with-63-million-pages.html/comment-page-1#comment-267869</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Purbita Ditecha]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 19:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=34947#comment-267869</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Free blogging services always gives a painful ending to our hard works.It is seen that some of free service providers say that there is no limitation but every thing has a limit such blogger.com will deactivate or delete any blog with prior notice and never gives an chance to take a backup due huge traffic [ bandwidth problem] , similarly tumblr also does the same.
You are exactly 200% right as we doing hard work in contents creation and we have to full control on it which can give only a self hosted blog.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Free blogging services always gives a painful ending to our hard works.It is seen that some of free service providers say that there is no limitation but every thing has a limit such blogger.com will deactivate or delete any blog with prior notice and never gives an chance to take a backup due huge traffic [ bandwidth problem] , similarly tumblr also does the same.<br />
You are exactly 200% right as we doing hard work in contents creation and we have to full control on it which can give only a self hosted blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Michael Martinez		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/how-to-not-make-the-mistake-15-million-posterous-bloggers-made-with-63-million-pages.html/comment-page-1#comment-267852</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Martinez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2013 18:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=34947#comment-267852</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[301-redirects are nice but they&#039;re not THAT important.  There is, by the way, no way that people can avoid using third-party services.  If your Webhost goes down, you&#039;re screwed.  If your server goes down, you&#039;re screwed.  If your Webhosting service provider goes out of business, you&#039;re screwed.  If your domain registrar goes out of business, you&#039;re screwed.

15 million Websites is not very many.  A lot of them will be inactive anyway.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>301-redirects are nice but they&#8217;re not THAT important.  There is, by the way, no way that people can avoid using third-party services.  If your Webhost goes down, you&#8217;re screwed.  If your server goes down, you&#8217;re screwed.  If your Webhosting service provider goes out of business, you&#8217;re screwed.  If your domain registrar goes out of business, you&#8217;re screwed.</p>
<p>15 million Websites is not very many.  A lot of them will be inactive anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
