<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Get Your Own Google Browser Size Tool Alternative In Under 5 Minutes	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/howto-google-browser-size-alternative.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/howto-google-browser-size-alternative.html?utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s Search and Social Media Authority</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 15:21:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ruud Hein		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/howto-google-browser-size-alternative.html/comment-page-1#comment-234096</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ruud Hein]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Oct 2012 17:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=31445#comment-234096</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/howto-google-browser-size-alternative.html/comment-page-1#comment-229196&quot;&gt;Pieter&lt;/a&gt;.

True. On the other hand, on a good number of sites the data still correlates. I think that&#039;s mostly because there is a browser size comfort zone which seems to be between 900-1100 pixels. Even people with larger screens don&#039;t consistently go for maximized browser windows, for example.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/howto-google-browser-size-alternative.html/comment-page-1#comment-229196" data-wpel-link="internal">Pieter</a>.</p>
<p>True. On the other hand, on a good number of sites the data still correlates. I think that&#8217;s mostly because there is a browser size comfort zone which seems to be between 900-1100 pixels. Even people with larger screens don&#8217;t consistently go for maximized browser windows, for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Pieter		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/howto-google-browser-size-alternative.html/comment-page-1#comment-229196</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pieter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2012 08:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=31445#comment-229196</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The only downside of using this method, is that you can&#039;t see the current situation. The data used on that image is from 2009. We are 2012 now, with lots of different screen sizes since then (tablets, smartphones, huge screens). A lot has changed in 3 years and will continue to change. The iPad didn&#039;t even exist in 2009...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only downside of using this method, is that you can&#8217;t see the current situation. The data used on that image is from 2009. We are 2012 now, with lots of different screen sizes since then (tablets, smartphones, huge screens). A lot has changed in 3 years and will continue to change. The iPad didn&#8217;t even exist in 2009&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
