<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: InfluenceRank: Google&#8217;s Social Media PageRank	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/influencerank-googles-social-media-pagerank.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/influencerank-googles-social-media-pagerank.html?utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s Search and Social Media Authority</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 12:50:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: joseph sorbara		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/influencerank-googles-social-media-pagerank.html/comment-page-1#comment-300019</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joseph sorbara]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2013 22:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=3876#comment-300019</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I see no one seems to mind that G plans to make even more money with there users &quot;private&quot; data...,]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see no one seems to mind that G plans to make even more money with there users &#8220;private&#8221; data&#8230;,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jeremiah Reagan		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/influencerank-googles-social-media-pagerank.html/comment-page-1#comment-72004</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeremiah Reagan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Apr 2011 10:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=3876#comment-72004</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hey there Jordan. Very well written article and very informative... Thanks for the link to the Google businessweek article (very informative as well). I have a question though... Many people keep talking about Google&#039;s new PR system and the alterations there making, and I hear many people talking about Bing&#039;s growing success... What role do you think the new &quot;Google +1 Ranking System&quot; will play in determining websites PR and of course there overall &quot;success.&quot;

Thanks for the advice Jordan!

Cheers,

Jeremiah
Chairman &#038; CEO
http://www.thenerdblurb.com
http://www.tnbhosting.com]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey there Jordan. Very well written article and very informative&#8230; Thanks for the link to the Google businessweek article (very informative as well). I have a question though&#8230; Many people keep talking about Google&#8217;s new PR system and the alterations there making, and I hear many people talking about Bing&#8217;s growing success&#8230; What role do you think the new &#8220;Google +1 Ranking System&#8221; will play in determining websites PR and of course there overall &#8220;success.&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks for the advice Jordan!</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Jeremiah<br />
Chairman &amp; CEO<br />
<a href="http://www.thenerdblurb.com" rel="ugc nofollow external noopener noreferrer" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" class="ext-link">http://www.thenerdblurb.com</a><br />
<a href="http://www.tnbhosting.com" rel="ugc nofollow external noopener noreferrer" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" class="ext-link">http://www.tnbhosting.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Cool Gifts		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/influencerank-googles-social-media-pagerank.html/comment-page-1#comment-9357</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cool Gifts]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 02:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=3876#comment-9357</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Very interesting. It seems like if anyone could do this well, it would be Google. I can&#039;t wait to see where this goes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting. It seems like if anyone could do this well, it would be Google. I can&#8217;t wait to see where this goes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: CJ		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/influencerank-googles-social-media-pagerank.html/comment-page-1#comment-9293</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 09:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=3876#comment-9293</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Nice article.

Google has been exploring sentiment for quite a while actually, you can see evidence of papers written by the G guys. Sentiment analysis is not a new area of research. Check out Peter Turney&#039;s work or Bo Pang and Lillian Lee (early 2000).

Also ranking in social networks isn&#039;t new either. An interesting recent project is the Tunkrank project. 

I wrote a post on sentiment analysis, seo and search a while back which you might find useful:

Excuse the rubbish formatting (migration from blogspot):
http://www.scienceforseo.com/opinion-mining/sentiment-analysis-in-text/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice article.</p>
<p>Google has been exploring sentiment for quite a while actually, you can see evidence of papers written by the G guys. Sentiment analysis is not a new area of research. Check out Peter Turney&#8217;s work or Bo Pang and Lillian Lee (early 2000).</p>
<p>Also ranking in social networks isn&#8217;t new either. An interesting recent project is the Tunkrank project. </p>
<p>I wrote a post on sentiment analysis, seo and search a while back which you might find useful:</p>
<p>Excuse the rubbish formatting (migration from blogspot):<br />
<a href="http://www.scienceforseo.com/opinion-mining/sentiment-analysis-in-text/" rel="ugc nofollow external noopener noreferrer" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" class="ext-link">http://www.scienceforseo.com/opinion-mining/sentiment-analysis-in-text/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Pat Strader		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/influencerank-googles-social-media-pagerank.html/comment-page-1#comment-9234</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pat Strader]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 00:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=3876#comment-9234</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Since reading Bill Slawski&#039;s post about Google incorporating social I have been struggling with how to explain this concept.

Your succinct explanation is appreciated.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since reading Bill Slawski&#8217;s post about Google incorporating social I have been struggling with how to explain this concept.</p>
<p>Your succinct explanation is appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tyson		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/influencerank-googles-social-media-pagerank.html/comment-page-1#comment-9226</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tyson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 15:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=3876#comment-9226</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I sphunn this after reading the first sentence.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I sphunn this after reading the first sentence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Doug Kreitzberg		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/influencerank-googles-social-media-pagerank.html/comment-page-1#comment-9220</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Doug Kreitzberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=3876#comment-9220</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Good post. Of particular interest is ranking by the quality of the interactions.  In the light, you are really ranking the strength of a community.  Tie that in to the community&#039;s interests and you would have a powerful ad tool.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post. Of particular interest is ranking by the quality of the interactions.  In the light, you are really ranking the strength of a community.  Tie that in to the community&#8217;s interests and you would have a powerful ad tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SLight		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/influencerank-googles-social-media-pagerank.html/comment-page-1#comment-9216</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SLight]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 08:46:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=3876#comment-9216</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Can&#039;t help but think Googles going to be using this to offer some kind of brand management / assessment tool. Ie, find out how many mentions your brand / product / promotion gets. Are they good mentions / bad mentions. What words are related to your product, what sites are, what demographic. The possibilities are pretty much endless with this kind of data. Many agencies already offer this kind of service, I think Google is just getting in on the act with this.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t help but think Googles going to be using this to offer some kind of brand management / assessment tool. Ie, find out how many mentions your brand / product / promotion gets. Are they good mentions / bad mentions. What words are related to your product, what sites are, what demographic. The possibilities are pretty much endless with this kind of data. Many agencies already offer this kind of service, I think Google is just getting in on the act with this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sean		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/influencerank-googles-social-media-pagerank.html/comment-page-1#comment-9202</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 17:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=3876#comment-9202</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Jordan - 

Interesting post. It&#039;s likely that InfluenceRank will look into who you are connected to and how messages travel through those hubs. The idea of social karma having value is also very powerful.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jordan &#8211; </p>
<p>Interesting post. It&#8217;s likely that InfluenceRank will look into who you are connected to and how messages travel through those hubs. The idea of social karma having value is also very powerful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
