<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Is It Time To Switch To A Social Browser?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/is-it-time-to-switch-to-a-social-browser.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/is-it-time-to-switch-to-a-social-browser.html?utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s Search and Social Media Authority</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 15:43:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Steven Bradley		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/is-it-time-to-switch-to-a-social-browser.html/comment-page-1#comment-28506</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steven Bradley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 19:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/11/05/is-it-time-to-switch-to-a-social-browser/#comment-28506</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I downloaded Flock awhile ago, but haven&#039;t really used it. I think I grabbed the download before I was interested in social media and so didn&#039;t see a reason to switch.

The only thing preventing me from using it now is a reliance on a lit of Firefox plugins. I suppose I should see what will and won&#039;t work with Flock and decide if the trade off is worth it.

I&#039;ll probably stick with Firefox, because I do like it a lot, but I&#039;m always open to new things so you never know,]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I downloaded Flock awhile ago, but haven&#8217;t really used it. I think I grabbed the download before I was interested in social media and so didn&#8217;t see a reason to switch.</p>
<p>The only thing preventing me from using it now is a reliance on a lit of Firefox plugins. I suppose I should see what will and won&#8217;t work with Flock and decide if the trade off is worth it.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll probably stick with Firefox, because I do like it a lot, but I&#8217;m always open to new things so you never know,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Brad		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/is-it-time-to-switch-to-a-social-browser.html/comment-page-1#comment-28505</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 18:28:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/11/05/is-it-time-to-switch-to-a-social-browser/#comment-28505</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been using Flock on a Mac for the last year.  The newest version has a busier interface than I like, but they did add some nice features.

I switched to Flock from Firefox after FF quit working for me.  I have not had the same memory leakage issues I had with FF either.  Many, but not all of the Firefox Plugins will work with Flock although I tend not to use many.  I do like the fact that Google is not the default search engine (Yahoo is) and that you can add your own search engines plus change the default.

I don&#039;t use the social aspects of Flock much but I like it and it is worth trying.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using Flock on a Mac for the last year.  The newest version has a busier interface than I like, but they did add some nice features.</p>
<p>I switched to Flock from Firefox after FF quit working for me.  I have not had the same memory leakage issues I had with FF either.  Many, but not all of the Firefox Plugins will work with Flock although I tend not to use many.  I do like the fact that Google is not the default search engine (Yahoo is) and that you can add your own search engines plus change the default.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t use the social aspects of Flock much but I like it and it is worth trying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Badi Jones		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/is-it-time-to-switch-to-a-social-browser.html/comment-page-1#comment-28504</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Badi Jones]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 23:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/11/05/is-it-time-to-switch-to-a-social-browser/#comment-28504</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I was using Flock a lot for a few months.  They did make it really easy to use Flickr, and that was the main reason I was using it, but after a while, I started having withdrawal systems from not being able to use all of the plugins that I had gotten used to with Firefox.

I was using version .7 before, and now they are up to .9, soI suppose it&#039;s time to give Flock another shot.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was using Flock a lot for a few months.  They did make it really easy to use Flickr, and that was the main reason I was using it, but after a while, I started having withdrawal systems from not being able to use all of the plugins that I had gotten used to with Firefox.</p>
<p>I was using version .7 before, and now they are up to .9, soI suppose it&#8217;s time to give Flock another shot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
