<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: It Worked! How I Got a Google Link Penalty Lifted	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/it-worked-how-i-got-a-google-link-penalty-lifted.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/it-worked-how-i-got-a-google-link-penalty-lifted.html?utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s Search and Social Media Authority</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2020 00:14:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: roger		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/it-worked-how-i-got-a-google-link-penalty-lifted.html/comment-page-1#comment-277115</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[roger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 19:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=34163#comment-277115</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Denise!

I haven&#039;t heard of anything like this.  As far as I know, you just have to fix and resubmit your business information and wait.  

The only way to communicate with Google about local listings, as far as I know, is through the &#039;report a problem&#039; function.  Those kind of disappear down a black hole once you submit them, though, and I&#039;m not sure if it&#039;s designed for this sort of thing.

I&#039;d be curious to know what you do to resolve the issue, though!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Denise!</p>
<p>I haven&#8217;t heard of anything like this.  As far as I know, you just have to fix and resubmit your business information and wait.  </p>
<p>The only way to communicate with Google about local listings, as far as I know, is through the &#8216;report a problem&#8217; function.  Those kind of disappear down a black hole once you submit them, though, and I&#8217;m not sure if it&#8217;s designed for this sort of thing.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d be curious to know what you do to resolve the issue, though!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: roger		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/it-worked-how-i-got-a-google-link-penalty-lifted.html/comment-page-1#comment-277112</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[roger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 19:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=34163#comment-277112</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/it-worked-how-i-got-a-google-link-penalty-lifted.html/comment-page-1#comment-276638&quot;&gt;Hasan&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Hasan.  Thanks!  

To answer your question, I actually noticed ranking improvements first, which prompted me to check Webmaster Tools.  That&#039;s when I saw the message that Google had revoked the penalty.  This was about a month after I had used the disavow tool and submitted the reconsideration request.  (The message from Google had only been there for a day when I noticed the ranking improvement.)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/it-worked-how-i-got-a-google-link-penalty-lifted.html/comment-page-1#comment-276638" data-wpel-link="internal">Hasan</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Hasan.  Thanks!  </p>
<p>To answer your question, I actually noticed ranking improvements first, which prompted me to check Webmaster Tools.  That&#8217;s when I saw the message that Google had revoked the penalty.  This was about a month after I had used the disavow tool and submitted the reconsideration request.  (The message from Google had only been there for a day when I noticed the ranking improvement.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: roger		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/it-worked-how-i-got-a-google-link-penalty-lifted.html/comment-page-1#comment-277111</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[roger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2013 19:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=34163#comment-277111</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/it-worked-how-i-got-a-google-link-penalty-lifted.html/comment-page-1#comment-276590&quot;&gt;Swayam Das&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks for the comment and question Swayam!  

My understanding is that the EMD algorithm update was not a penalty, but that it dialed down having an exact match domain as a ranking signal.  I would assume that to make up any ranking losses, it&#039;d be necessary to increase efforts on other ranking factors (links, on-site, etc.) so that you&#039;re not depending on the domain name to rank.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/it-worked-how-i-got-a-google-link-penalty-lifted.html/comment-page-1#comment-276590" data-wpel-link="internal">Swayam Das</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment and question Swayam!  </p>
<p>My understanding is that the EMD algorithm update was not a penalty, but that it dialed down having an exact match domain as a ranking signal.  I would assume that to make up any ranking losses, it&#8217;d be necessary to increase efforts on other ranking factors (links, on-site, etc.) so that you&#8217;re not depending on the domain name to rank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Denise Crosbie		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/it-worked-how-i-got-a-google-link-penalty-lifted.html/comment-page-1#comment-276647</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Denise Crosbie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 23:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=34163#comment-276647</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Actually, another thought - I have recently noticed a huge and sudden drop in the google places listing of one of my clients though, but again saw no message from Google.  I have come to the conclusion that I think it was penalized due to being in a Category that was not 100% accurate which I have since fixed (just today).  Do you know if there is a way to send a &quot;reconsideration request&quot; for a google places listing?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, another thought &#8211; I have recently noticed a huge and sudden drop in the google places listing of one of my clients though, but again saw no message from Google.  I have come to the conclusion that I think it was penalized due to being in a Category that was not 100% accurate which I have since fixed (just today).  Do you know if there is a way to send a &#8220;reconsideration request&#8221; for a google places listing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Hasan		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/it-worked-how-i-got-a-google-link-penalty-lifted.html/comment-page-1#comment-276638</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hasan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 22:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=34163#comment-276638</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Congratulations for getting the site back in Google.

You didn&#039;t mention when you got the message from Google? Was it at the same time you regained your traffic?

Best,
Hasan]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations for getting the site back in Google.</p>
<p>You didn&#8217;t mention when you got the message from Google? Was it at the same time you regained your traffic?</p>
<p>Best,<br />
Hasan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Swayam Das		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/it-worked-how-i-got-a-google-link-penalty-lifted.html/comment-page-1#comment-276590</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Swayam Das]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2013 18:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=34163#comment-276590</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Just wondering is it possible to lift the EMD penalty? What are your views on it?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wondering is it possible to lift the EMD penalty? What are your views on it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
