<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Why I think Link-based algorithm of Google is good and Social metrics should only be an additional help	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/link-social-algo.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/link-social-algo.html?utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s Search and Social Media Authority</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2014 15:22:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Brian Zeng		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/link-social-algo.html/comment-page-1#comment-203355</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Zeng]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jun 2012 14:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=27883#comment-203355</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[hi Manish,
it&#039;s obvious that seo has gone social.
but with backlinks,we have some nice paid backlink tracking tools to identify our competitor&#039;s link profile,is there any tool to do the same thing for social signal??]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi Manish,<br />
it&#8217;s obvious that seo has gone social.<br />
but with backlinks,we have some nice paid backlink tracking tools to identify our competitor&#8217;s link profile,is there any tool to do the same thing for social signal??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Magnus		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/link-social-algo.html/comment-page-1#comment-200512</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Magnus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 10:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=27883#comment-200512</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m, like you, not sure wether social signals will ever be more than an added bonus. However, I do disagree that buying them would be risky (if done properly). It&#039;s just so much easier faking tweets than real links in real articles.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m, like you, not sure wether social signals will ever be more than an added bonus. However, I do disagree that buying them would be risky (if done properly). It&#8217;s just so much easier faking tweets than real links in real articles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Manish Pandey		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/link-social-algo.html/comment-page-1#comment-200440</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Manish Pandey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 00:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=27883#comment-200440</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/link-social-algo.html/comment-page-1#comment-200300&quot;&gt;Lee&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks for your insightful comment Lee. As Danny from SEL said link building means getting those &quot;hard links&quot; not those &quot;easy links.&quot; :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/link-social-algo.html/comment-page-1#comment-200300" data-wpel-link="internal">Lee</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks for your insightful comment Lee. As Danny from SEL said link building means getting those &#8220;hard links&#8221; not those &#8220;easy links.&#8221; 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Manish Pandey		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/link-social-algo.html/comment-page-1#comment-200439</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Manish Pandey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 00:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=27883#comment-200439</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/link-social-algo.html/comment-page-1#comment-199823&quot;&gt;Mahesh Mohan&lt;/a&gt;.

Right you&#039;re Mahesh but PR lost it&#039;s value way back people who know about it don&#039;t bother too much. :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/link-social-algo.html/comment-page-1#comment-199823" data-wpel-link="internal">Mahesh Mohan</a>.</p>
<p>Right you&#8217;re Mahesh but PR lost it&#8217;s value way back people who know about it don&#8217;t bother too much. 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lee		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/link-social-algo.html/comment-page-1#comment-200300</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2012 13:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=27883#comment-200300</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Manish, great post and i totally agree with you. Backlinks should always be the foundation and main stats used to rank sites. Google just needs to keep updating their algo to throw spammers and link builders off course.

Like the latest penguin update for example, which has let thousands of people complaining all over the forums. If people realised that link building isn&#039;t easy and that the only links worth obtaining are hard to get they would be having a lot more success.

Social signals are of course important as you can measure the amount of people talking about a specific site. However some fantastic sites are in niches that never really get discussed nor do they hit the eye of the social media giants.

Really enjoyed your post, keep it up

Regards
Lee]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Manish, great post and i totally agree with you. Backlinks should always be the foundation and main stats used to rank sites. Google just needs to keep updating their algo to throw spammers and link builders off course.</p>
<p>Like the latest penguin update for example, which has let thousands of people complaining all over the forums. If people realised that link building isn&#8217;t easy and that the only links worth obtaining are hard to get they would be having a lot more success.</p>
<p>Social signals are of course important as you can measure the amount of people talking about a specific site. However some fantastic sites are in niches that never really get discussed nor do they hit the eye of the social media giants.</p>
<p>Really enjoyed your post, keep it up</p>
<p>Regards<br />
Lee</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mahesh Mohan		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/link-social-algo.html/comment-page-1#comment-199823</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mahesh Mohan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jun 2012 14:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=27883#comment-199823</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[They should never show PageRank publicly. To some extent it will help.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They should never show PageRank publicly. To some extent it will help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
