<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Longer headlines for select ads on Google	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/long-form-adwords.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/long-form-adwords.html?utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s Search and Social Media Authority</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 20:17:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Kirsty		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/long-form-adwords.html/comment-page-1#comment-58327</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kirsty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Feb 2011 22:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/long-form-adwords.html#comment-58327</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yeah they are right that it is more understandable when a post have a picture of what you really mean. This screen shot is very helpful for us to fully understand your message. I hope you will continue doing it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah they are right that it is more understandable when a post have a picture of what you really mean. This screen shot is very helpful for us to fully understand your message. I hope you will continue doing it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Val @ Web Tracking Guide		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/long-form-adwords.html/comment-page-1#comment-56587</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Val @ Web Tracking Guide]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Feb 2011 20:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/long-form-adwords.html#comment-56587</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thumbs up for the screenshot. I read this news elsewhere and was disappointed about a lack of a screenshot there.

Advertisers really need to double-check their ad copy for compatibility with this mode.

Some people complain that with this change, those select ads are even harder to distinguish from the natural results. This may be good for the advertisers short-term, but may also hurt the reputation of Google. A clear distinction has been one of their major benefits.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thumbs up for the screenshot. I read this news elsewhere and was disappointed about a lack of a screenshot there.</p>
<p>Advertisers really need to double-check their ad copy for compatibility with this mode.</p>
<p>Some people complain that with this change, those select ads are even harder to distinguish from the natural results. This may be good for the advertisers short-term, but may also hurt the reputation of Google. A clear distinction has been one of their major benefits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ryan Miller		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/long-form-adwords.html/comment-page-1#comment-55962</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryan Miller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 17:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/long-form-adwords.html#comment-55962</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Well this is an interesting development.  The screengrabs are great, and show exactly what we can come to expect of this change.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well this is an interesting development.  The screengrabs are great, and show exactly what we can come to expect of this change.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
