<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: MSN support rep on link exchanges and penalties	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/msn-support-rep-on-link-exchanges-and-penalties.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/msn-support-rep-on-link-exchanges-and-penalties.html?utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s Search and Social Media Authority</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 02:38:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: rmccarley		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/msn-support-rep-on-link-exchanges-and-penalties.html/comment-page-1#comment-27358</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rmccarley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 02:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scoop.com/2006/10/16/msn-support-rep-on-link-exchanges-and-penalties/#comment-27358</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The point about getting more traffic from the links than from MSN is an important one. WTF is MSN to say those links aren&#039;t relevant if the links are proving to be more relevant than MSN?

This is a concern I have with Google as well. When you break people down by interests and intentions the &quot;relevance&quot; can be surprising.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point about getting more traffic from the links than from MSN is an important one. WTF is MSN to say those links aren&#8217;t relevant if the links are proving to be more relevant than MSN?</p>
<p>This is a concern I have with Google as well. When you break people down by interests and intentions the &#8220;relevance&#8221; can be surprising.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: drum		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/msn-support-rep-on-link-exchanges-and-penalties.html/comment-page-1#comment-27357</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[drum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2006 19:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scoop.com/2006/10/16/msn-support-rep-on-link-exchanges-and-penalties/#comment-27357</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Good find. Sounds like MSN is doing what Matt Cutts spoke of in the summer.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good find. Sounds like MSN is doing what Matt Cutts spoke of in the summer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
