<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Pay for Performance Optimization Model	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/pay-for-performance-optimization-model.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/pay-for-performance-optimization-model.html?utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s Search and Social Media Authority</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 13:45:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Pete		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/pay-for-performance-optimization-model.html/comment-page-1#comment-27630</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pete]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 14:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seo-scoop.com/2007/02/26/pay-for-performance-optimization-model/#comment-27630</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[eTrafficjams no longer offers a pay for play service, however, they have performed. They evaluated how well structured my site was, how content rich it was and how difficult it would be to get a top position for my keyword. They said that if they did not feel they had a shot at it, they would not have evne accepted the project.

Once the evaluation was done, they charged an upfront fee of $3500 to get the site ready and they proposed a rate for top placement in each search engine. That upfront cost would not be incurred for future key words, it was a one time deal.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>eTrafficjams no longer offers a pay for play service, however, they have performed. They evaluated how well structured my site was, how content rich it was and how difficult it would be to get a top position for my keyword. They said that if they did not feel they had a shot at it, they would not have evne accepted the project.</p>
<p>Once the evaluation was done, they charged an upfront fee of $3500 to get the site ready and they proposed a rate for top placement in each search engine. That upfront cost would not be incurred for future key words, it was a one time deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
