Comments on: Putting Value On Value: What Mozy, Twitter & the NYT Have In Common https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/put-value-on-value.html?utm_source=feed&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=feed Canada's Search and Social Media Authority Thu, 30 May 2013 20:17:53 +0000 hourly 1 By: Ruud Hein https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/put-value-on-value.html/comment-page-1#comment-77074 Wed, 01 Jun 2011 14:19:18 +0000 https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/put-value-on-value.html#comment-77074 In reply to Bjorn Johansen.

Thanks for the comment, Bjorn.

Freemium can be made to work. What’s interesting is that simple straight forward premium often seems to work much better. Flickr does so-so; SmugMug is a huge financial success.

Perhaps it depends on the industry?

]]> By: Bjorn Johansen https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/put-value-on-value.html/comment-page-1#comment-77008 Tue, 31 May 2011 21:58:35 +0000 https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/put-value-on-value.html#comment-77008 I think paying for premium products are right. Giving a minimum for free, and reserving som premium features for paying members are a good business model in my opinion. By having the basics free, people gets to try the services before they decide to pay. I don’t like the time limited free service that much, because it can Bea lot of annoying advertising if you decide not to use the services.. I think that it’s good news for bloggers that newspapers choose a paying model. This can lead to more blog readers, and maybe better online news for the paying members.

]]>