Comments on: Ruud Questions: Richard Hamilton (from XML Press)

By: Richard Hamilton

Richard Hamilton — Mon, 19 Apr 2010 18:38:19 +0000

Simon,

Too bad about your customer, but I think you may be right about not wanting to work for that kind of person. Odds are they wouldn’t have been a long-term customer anyway.

Thanks for reading the interview and commenting on it.

Richard Hamilton
.-= Richard Hamilton recently posted: Ruud Questions for the Publisher =-.

By: Simon Raybould

Simon Raybould — Sun, 18 Apr 2010 21:04:33 +0000

“It’s hard to give away too much information”. Maybe – but it’s not impossible.

Sadly we’ve just go an email from a non-client who said he no longer wanted to hire us as he’d read the solution to all his problems on our blog. *sigh*

The only good thing about that is that I console myself that we wouldn’t have wanted to work for that kind of person anyway! 🙂

Simon

By: Ruud Hein

Ruud Hein — Sat, 17 Apr 2010 02:15:25 +0000

Most kind of you Richard although I do like to point out that what makes the interview, is the interviewee 🙂

By: Richard Hamilton

Richard Hamilton — Sat, 17 Apr 2010 00:41:47 +0000

Ruud,

Thanks very much for doing the interview. I’ve looked at some of the other entries and am impressed with the depth of your research and your excellent questions.

For those outside the US this may be an obscure reference, but your questions reminded me of James Lipton, host of “Inside the Actor’s Studio,” because of the depth of research (no one ever asked me an interview question based on my reply to someone else’s blog entry:).

Thanks very much; it was an honor to participate.
Richard Hamilton
.-= Richard Hamilton recently posted: Ruud Questions for the Publisher =-.