<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Importance of Relevance to Social Media	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/the-importance-of-relevance-to-social-media.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/the-importance-of-relevance-to-social-media.html?utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s Search and Social Media Authority</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2013 14:03:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Nick James		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/the-importance-of-relevance-to-social-media.html/comment-page-1#comment-669</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 21:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/the-importance-of-relevance-to-social-media.html#comment-669</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great post Jenn. I&#039;ve promised myself I&#039;ll become more active in Digg this year, but with the horror stories of its anti-SEO bias, I wonder is it worth it? It seems a lot of hassle if everything you submit gets immediately buried because it relevant to search marketing or the like (they don&#039;t even give you a suitable category to submit to). Saying that though, Jeff seems to be doing all right over there.
I know what you&#039;re saying though regarding other niches and it may be worth dabbling to keep my hand in, so to speak, should it one day come in useful.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post Jenn. I&#8217;ve promised myself I&#8217;ll become more active in Digg this year, but with the horror stories of its anti-SEO bias, I wonder is it worth it? It seems a lot of hassle if everything you submit gets immediately buried because it relevant to search marketing or the like (they don&#8217;t even give you a suitable category to submit to). Saying that though, Jeff seems to be doing all right over there.<br />
I know what you&#8217;re saying though regarding other niches and it may be worth dabbling to keep my hand in, so to speak, should it one day come in useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
