<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 7 Easy Steps To Turn Your Twitter Account Into A SEO Magnet&#8230;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/twitter-seo-magnet.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/twitter-seo-magnet.html?utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s Search and Social Media Authority</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 May 2013 13:13:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Damon		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/twitter-seo-magnet.html/comment-page-1#comment-94001</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Damon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 18:49:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=15320#comment-94001</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Wow,
That is awesome, I hadn&#039;t heard of that. I will have to check it out.  The main reason I didn&#039;t like the old way of shortening the URL&#039;s is because of the trust factor as you mentioned and also I felt it took away from some branding opportunities.  Why wouldn&#039;t I want my name (which is my url) to appear in everyone&#039;s twitter stream, even if they didn&#039;t click the link, it still helps if they see my brand every once in awhile.

This new feature appears to solve that problem for me and would help on some of my slightly longer slugs.

Thanks for the tip Heba]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow,<br />
That is awesome, I hadn&#8217;t heard of that. I will have to check it out.  The main reason I didn&#8217;t like the old way of shortening the URL&#8217;s is because of the trust factor as you mentioned and also I felt it took away from some branding opportunities.  Why wouldn&#8217;t I want my name (which is my url) to appear in everyone&#8217;s twitter stream, even if they didn&#8217;t click the link, it still helps if they see my brand every once in awhile.</p>
<p>This new feature appears to solve that problem for me and would help on some of my slightly longer slugs.</p>
<p>Thanks for the tip Heba</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Heba Hosny		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/twitter-seo-magnet.html/comment-page-1#comment-93959</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heba Hosny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 18:00:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=15320#comment-93959</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/twitter-seo-magnet.html/comment-page-1#comment-92742&quot;&gt;Damon&lt;/a&gt;.

Thank you so much for encouraging words, Damon. 
I agree with you 100% that search engines are favoring social media big time. Google Panada is just one example.
It&#039;s interesting that you brought up URL shorteners. Recently, Twitter added a very cool URL shortening feature that allows you to paste the original URL and Twitter takes care of the rest. Interestingly, the final URL doesn&#039;t look shortened. Instead, they remove the &quot;http//www.&quot; and display part of the domain name. For example, If I pasted a link to this article in my tweet, it will look something like: &quot;searchenginepeople.com/blog/twitter...&quot;This shortened link doesn&#039;t look as suspicious as conventional URL shorteners. Don&#039;t you just love Twitter? :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/twitter-seo-magnet.html/comment-page-1#comment-92742" data-wpel-link="internal">Damon</a>.</p>
<p>Thank you so much for encouraging words, Damon.<br />
I agree with you 100% that search engines are favoring social media big time. Google Panada is just one example.<br />
It&#8217;s interesting that you brought up URL shorteners. Recently, Twitter added a very cool URL shortening feature that allows you to paste the original URL and Twitter takes care of the rest. Interestingly, the final URL doesn&#8217;t look shortened. Instead, they remove the &#8220;http//www.&#8221; and display part of the domain name. For example, If I pasted a link to this article in my tweet, it will look something like: &#8220;searchenginepeople.com/blog/twitter&#8230;&#8221;This shortened link doesn&#8217;t look as suspicious as conventional URL shorteners. Don&#8217;t you just love Twitter? 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Damon		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/twitter-seo-magnet.html/comment-page-1#comment-92742</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Damon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Aug 2011 09:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=15320#comment-92742</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great Tips Heba,

I never liked using the URL shortners and rarely do.  My domain is short enough that I would rather just put my own site in for a link. A few months ago I realized that I need to keep my slugs as short as possible, so I can usually fit my url in a tweet.

That is a great tip on SEOing your twitter lists.  Hadn&#039;t thought of that one.

Social Media is the future of search I think, so either get on it or it will pass you by.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Tips Heba,</p>
<p>I never liked using the URL shortners and rarely do.  My domain is short enough that I would rather just put my own site in for a link. A few months ago I realized that I need to keep my slugs as short as possible, so I can usually fit my url in a tweet.</p>
<p>That is a great tip on SEOing your twitter lists.  Hadn&#8217;t thought of that one.</p>
<p>Social Media is the future of search I think, so either get on it or it will pass you by.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Heba Hosny		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/twitter-seo-magnet.html/comment-page-1#comment-75945</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heba Hosny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 21:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=15320#comment-75945</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/twitter-seo-magnet.html/comment-page-1#comment-75805&quot;&gt;Tom&lt;/a&gt;.

Eaxctly, Tom and the best part is: you no longer need to leave Twitter to watch your favorite video. In fact, you can add your favorite videos to your favorite tweets. 
I love Twitter! What&#039;s not to love about a beautiful blue bird? :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/twitter-seo-magnet.html/comment-page-1#comment-75805" data-wpel-link="internal">Tom</a>.</p>
<p>Eaxctly, Tom and the best part is: you no longer need to leave Twitter to watch your favorite video. In fact, you can add your favorite videos to your favorite tweets.<br />
I love Twitter! What&#8217;s not to love about a beautiful blue bird? 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Heba Hosny		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/twitter-seo-magnet.html/comment-page-1#comment-75943</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heba Hosny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 21:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=15320#comment-75943</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/twitter-seo-magnet.html/comment-page-1#comment-75752&quot;&gt;Christopher R. Gabriel&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks for raising this point, Christopher.
Point 2 was warning agianst using traditional URL shortners (such as google url shortner that would look something like http://goo.gl/whatever) as these would raise red flags. 
But what you and Ruud are doing is perfectly fine. That&#039;s a great contribution to the post. Thanks a lot :).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/twitter-seo-magnet.html/comment-page-1#comment-75752" data-wpel-link="internal">Christopher R. Gabriel</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks for raising this point, Christopher.<br />
Point 2 was warning agianst using traditional URL shortners (such as google url shortner that would look something like <a href="http://goo.gl/whatever" rel="ugc nofollow external noopener noreferrer" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" class="ext-link">http://goo.gl/whatever</a>) as these would raise red flags.<br />
But what you and Ruud are doing is perfectly fine. That&#8217;s a great contribution to the post. Thanks a lot :).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Heba Hosny		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/twitter-seo-magnet.html/comment-page-1#comment-75941</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heba Hosny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 21:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=15320#comment-75941</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/twitter-seo-magnet.html/comment-page-1#comment-75717&quot;&gt;Thomas&lt;/a&gt;.

I am glad you found these tips helpful, Thomas.
To me, the Twitter video feature was a pleasant surprise and search engines love Twitter lists. So, you have plenty of great stuff to work with. Which item will you give highest priority? :) I&#039;d love it if you shared with me your revamped Twitter account when all is done. Good luck.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/twitter-seo-magnet.html/comment-page-1#comment-75717" data-wpel-link="internal">Thomas</a>.</p>
<p>I am glad you found these tips helpful, Thomas.<br />
To me, the Twitter video feature was a pleasant surprise and search engines love Twitter lists. So, you have plenty of great stuff to work with. Which item will you give highest priority? 🙂 I&#8217;d love it if you shared with me your revamped Twitter account when all is done. Good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Heba Hosny		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/twitter-seo-magnet.html/comment-page-1#comment-75940</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heba Hosny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 20:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=15320#comment-75940</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/twitter-seo-magnet.html/comment-page-1#comment-75521&quot;&gt;Kim Davies @The Rendering Company&lt;/a&gt;.

You are mostly welcome, Kim .
It&#039;s a great idea to take baby steps when you feel you have a lot to do. I&#039;m so cusrious to know which item in the list will you start with :)?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/twitter-seo-magnet.html/comment-page-1#comment-75521" data-wpel-link="internal">Kim Davies @The Rendering Company</a>.</p>
<p>You are mostly welcome, Kim .<br />
It&#8217;s a great idea to take baby steps when you feel you have a lot to do. I&#8217;m so cusrious to know which item in the list will you start with :)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ruud Hein		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/twitter-seo-magnet.html/comment-page-1#comment-75890</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ruud Hein]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 15:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=15320#comment-75890</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/twitter-seo-magnet.html/comment-page-1#comment-75521&quot;&gt;Kim Davies @The Rendering Company&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks for dropping by, Kim. And yes, Kristi certainly deserves kudos: she&#039;s one of my favorite content curators out there. *And* does a good writing job. Talk about awesome.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/twitter-seo-magnet.html/comment-page-1#comment-75521" data-wpel-link="internal">Kim Davies @The Rendering Company</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks for dropping by, Kim. And yes, Kristi certainly deserves kudos: she&#8217;s one of my favorite content curators out there. *And* does a good writing job. Talk about awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Christopher R. Gabriel		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/twitter-seo-magnet.html/comment-page-1#comment-75886</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christopher R. Gabriel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 14:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=15320#comment-75886</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/twitter-seo-magnet.html/comment-page-1#comment-75752&quot;&gt;Christopher R. Gabriel&lt;/a&gt;.

Yep, I already have 2 shortening service (not using bit.ly, they&#039;re custom made), but I was interested about point 2 of the article, which was suggesting to not use url shortening services.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/twitter-seo-magnet.html/comment-page-1#comment-75752" data-wpel-link="internal">Christopher R. Gabriel</a>.</p>
<p>Yep, I already have 2 shortening service (not using bit.ly, they&#8217;re custom made), but I was interested about point 2 of the article, which was suggesting to not use url shortening services.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ruud Hein		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/twitter-seo-magnet.html/comment-page-1#comment-75885</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ruud Hein]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2011 14:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=15320#comment-75885</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/twitter-seo-magnet.html/comment-page-1#comment-75752&quot;&gt;Christopher R. Gabriel&lt;/a&gt;.

I like it a lot. For my own vanity domain ruudhein.com I use ruudhe.in, for example. I run it through Bit.ly but you could just as well (and probably better) set one up yourself.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/twitter-seo-magnet.html/comment-page-1#comment-75752" data-wpel-link="internal">Christopher R. Gabriel</a>.</p>
<p>I like it a lot. For my own vanity domain ruudhein.com I use ruudhe.in, for example. I run it through Bit.ly but you could just as well (and probably better) set one up yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
