<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Calculate URL Depth Using Excel	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/url-depth-excel.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/url-depth-excel.html?utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s Search and Social Media Authority</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2013 00:49:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ruud Hein		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/url-depth-excel.html/comment-page-1#comment-35172</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ruud Hein]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 14:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/url-depth-excel.html#comment-35172</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/url-depth-excel.html/comment-page-1#comment-34951&quot;&gt;well&lt;/a&gt;.

You&#039;re right, Well -- and Aidan: number of directories or URL parameters doesn&#039;t necessarily equate click-depth. It is a reasonable approximative measure though.

Re. Allied.edu: I&#039;m just using that site as an example in my Excel posts as we nor they stand anything to gain from the exposure :)

Aidan -- nice use of Xenu!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/url-depth-excel.html/comment-page-1#comment-34951" data-wpel-link="internal">well</a>.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re right, Well &#8212; and Aidan: number of directories or URL parameters doesn&#8217;t necessarily equate click-depth. It is a reasonable approximative measure though.</p>
<p>Re. Allied.edu: I&#8217;m just using that site as an example in my Excel posts as we nor they stand anything to gain from the exposure 🙂</p>
<p>Aidan &#8212; nice use of Xenu!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Aidan Beanland		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/url-depth-excel.html/comment-page-1#comment-35131</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aidan Beanland]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 05:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/url-depth-excel.html#comment-35131</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/url-depth-excel.html/comment-page-1#comment-34951&quot;&gt;well&lt;/a&gt;.

I agree with well - the number of directories in a URL doesn&#039;t automatically equate to click depth (although I&#039;ll be stealing your nifty Excel function for other purposes!). I use Xenu Link Checker to determine click depth as it&#039;s conveniently returned in its crawl report.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/url-depth-excel.html/comment-page-1#comment-34951" data-wpel-link="internal">well</a>.</p>
<p>I agree with well &#8211; the number of directories in a URL doesn&#8217;t automatically equate to click depth (although I&#8217;ll be stealing your nifty Excel function for other purposes!). I use Xenu Link Checker to determine click depth as it&#8217;s conveniently returned in its crawl report.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: well		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/url-depth-excel.html/comment-page-1#comment-34951</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[well]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2010 19:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/url-depth-excel.html#comment-34951</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think it&#039;s not directory depth Google follows, It is all about how the pages are being linked.  Think of it as a google PR, The path depth is not important to Google. Usually sites get the most links to the homepage, and from the homepage the PR is spread through the site. In some cases a lower page has a higher PR than the homepage.  That&#039;s how many clicks away from the home page that determines the lessening of the PR.  Furthermore, almost every single page for allied.edu is a couple of links away from the home page.  So, I don&#039;t think the page depth for this case shouldn&#039;t be any problems.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s not directory depth Google follows, It is all about how the pages are being linked.  Think of it as a google PR, The path depth is not important to Google. Usually sites get the most links to the homepage, and from the homepage the PR is spread through the site. In some cases a lower page has a higher PR than the homepage.  That&#8217;s how many clicks away from the home page that determines the lessening of the PR.  Furthermore, almost every single page for allied.edu is a couple of links away from the home page.  So, I don&#8217;t think the page depth for this case shouldn&#8217;t be any problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: mra		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/url-depth-excel.html/comment-page-1#comment-34804</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 04:56:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/url-depth-excel.html#comment-34804</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Good post and fantastic tricks to know the depth of URL so easily. Blogger can use this trick to know the backlinks depth.
.-= mra recently posted: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.labika.com/2009/11/how-to-increase-traffic-to-your-site.html&quot;&gt;How To Increase Traffic To Your Site&lt;/a&gt; =-.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post and fantastic tricks to know the depth of URL so easily. Blogger can use this trick to know the backlinks depth.<br />
.-= mra recently posted: <a href="http://www.labika.com/2009/11/how-to-increase-traffic-to-your-site.html" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="nofollow external noopener noreferrer" class="ext-link">How To Increase Traffic To Your Site</a> =-.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Victor		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/url-depth-excel.html/comment-page-1#comment-34697</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Victor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 21:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/url-depth-excel.html#comment-34697</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great! Thanks a lot for this trick, I&#039;ve never thought that url depth was so important. I&#039;ll use this formula to check the depth of the backlinks I get.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great! Thanks a lot for this trick, I&#8217;ve never thought that url depth was so important. I&#8217;ll use this formula to check the depth of the backlinks I get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
