<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 10 Things Google Wished You Knew	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/what-google-wished-you-knew.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/what-google-wished-you-knew.html?utm_source=feed&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=feed</link>
	<description>Canada&#039;s Search and Social Media Authority</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 15:51:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Thos003		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/what-google-wished-you-knew.html/comment-page-1#comment-109501</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thos003]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 20:34:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=18432#comment-109501</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Have you done any testing on stuffing your keyword meta tags? They may not use it bump you up in the ranks, but they could use it to push you down.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you done any testing on stuffing your keyword meta tags? They may not use it bump you up in the ranks, but they could use it to push you down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: jayson		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/what-google-wished-you-knew.html/comment-page-1#comment-92308</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jayson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 16:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=18432#comment-92308</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[We don&#039;t do meta keywords...This one is epic, still there are people using this one and expecting that it can help them rank. stuffing meta keyword property with all the keywords that they can put...I&#039;d rather stick with the anchor text targeting. Thanks a lot for this post Ruud:)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We don&#8217;t do meta keywords&#8230;This one is epic, still there are people using this one and expecting that it can help them rank. stuffing meta keyword property with all the keywords that they can put&#8230;I&#8217;d rather stick with the anchor text targeting. Thanks a lot for this post Ruud:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rana		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/what-google-wished-you-knew.html/comment-page-1#comment-92302</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rana]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2011 16:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=18432#comment-92302</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ruud,

Thank you for clarifying great list of &quot;myths&quot;. There is lot of confusion about duplicate content out there but I think point #1 made it really crystal clear.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ruud,</p>
<p>Thank you for clarifying great list of &#8220;myths&#8221;. There is lot of confusion about duplicate content out there but I think point #1 made it really crystal clear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jordan McClements		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/what-google-wished-you-knew.html/comment-page-1#comment-92165</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jordan McClements]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 20:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=18432#comment-92165</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/what-google-wished-you-knew.html/comment-page-1#comment-91959&quot;&gt;Micky&lt;/a&gt;.

OK.  Thanks!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/what-google-wished-you-knew.html/comment-page-1#comment-91959" data-wpel-link="internal">Micky</a>.</p>
<p>OK.  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ruud Hein		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/what-google-wished-you-knew.html/comment-page-1#comment-92144</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ruud Hein]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 18:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=18432#comment-92144</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/what-google-wished-you-knew.html/comment-page-1#comment-92003&quot;&gt;Steve&lt;/a&gt;.

Out of curiosity: we&#039;re talking huge amounts of duplicate content then, right? Which would equal a lot of low/NO PR pages.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/what-google-wished-you-knew.html/comment-page-1#comment-92003" data-wpel-link="internal">Steve</a>.</p>
<p>Out of curiosity: we&#8217;re talking huge amounts of duplicate content then, right? Which would equal a lot of low/NO PR pages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ruud Hein		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/what-google-wished-you-knew.html/comment-page-1#comment-92142</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ruud Hein]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 18:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=18432#comment-92142</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/what-google-wished-you-knew.html/comment-page-1#comment-92046&quot;&gt;Jordan McClements&lt;/a&gt;.

No: when you use a ccTLD Google uses that for geotargeting; not the server location.

Likewise, if you have a gTLD like .com, the geotargeting setting in webmaster tools trumps the server location.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/what-google-wished-you-knew.html/comment-page-1#comment-92046" data-wpel-link="internal">Jordan McClements</a>.</p>
<p>No: when you use a ccTLD Google uses that for geotargeting; not the server location.</p>
<p>Likewise, if you have a gTLD like .com, the geotargeting setting in webmaster tools trumps the server location.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sal Surra		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/what-google-wished-you-knew.html/comment-page-1#comment-92127</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sal Surra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 16:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=18432#comment-92127</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Nice list of items and quotes. It&#039;s good to revisit things like this from time to time to debunk and move on from the past.  Most of this was old hat, but I&#039;m surprised to see that Google will still rank a page even though it was block in the robots.txt file. I guess that makes sense since it&#039;s only blocking the bot from crawling the page.  When I want to remove a page from the engine I typically put a 410 if gone permanently, like low quality pages, or moved to a good page with a 301 if there is content that is relevant for it.  However, even in those cases, we don&#039;t block the engines from crawling because then the redirect or page gone tag will not work.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice list of items and quotes. It&#8217;s good to revisit things like this from time to time to debunk and move on from the past.  Most of this was old hat, but I&#8217;m surprised to see that Google will still rank a page even though it was block in the robots.txt file. I guess that makes sense since it&#8217;s only blocking the bot from crawling the page.  When I want to remove a page from the engine I typically put a 410 if gone permanently, like low quality pages, or moved to a good page with a 301 if there is content that is relevant for it.  However, even in those cases, we don&#8217;t block the engines from crawling because then the redirect or page gone tag will not work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Catherine @ Affiliate Marketers College		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/what-google-wished-you-knew.html/comment-page-1#comment-92085</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Catherine @ Affiliate Marketers College]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 12:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=18432#comment-92085</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[HI Ruud,
Yes, point number 9 about Geo targeting is interesting - thanks.
We are forever trying to work out what Google thinks and wants!
Regards
Catherine]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI Ruud,<br />
Yes, point number 9 about Geo targeting is interesting &#8211; thanks.<br />
We are forever trying to work out what Google thinks and wants!<br />
Regards<br />
Catherine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jordan McClements		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/what-google-wished-you-knew.html/comment-page-1#comment-92046</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jordan McClements]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 09:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=18432#comment-92046</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/what-google-wished-you-knew.html/comment-page-1#comment-91959&quot;&gt;Micky&lt;/a&gt;.

&quot;the ccTLD is generally a much stronger signal than the server&#039;s location could ever be..&quot;

So this means there is *some* weight on the physical location of your server, yes?  If so, are we talking minuscule amounts?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/what-google-wished-you-knew.html/comment-page-1#comment-91959" data-wpel-link="internal">Micky</a>.</p>
<p>&#8220;the ccTLD is generally a much stronger signal than the server&#8217;s location could ever be..&#8221;</p>
<p>So this means there is *some* weight on the physical location of your server, yes?  If so, are we talking minuscule amounts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Steve		</title>
		<link>https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/what-google-wished-you-knew.html/comment-page-1#comment-92003</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 04:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.searchenginepeople.com/?p=18432#comment-92003</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/what-google-wished-you-knew.html/comment-page-1#comment-91901&quot;&gt;Dr. Pete&lt;/a&gt;.

For what it&#039;s worth I completely agree with Dr. Pete, duplicate content in the wake of Panda can be a huge problem. My site received a -950 penalty which we are starting to shake off now that we have removed our duplicate content.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.searchenginepeople.com/blog/what-google-wished-you-knew.html/comment-page-1#comment-91901" data-wpel-link="internal">Dr. Pete</a>.</p>
<p>For what it&#8217;s worth I completely agree with Dr. Pete, duplicate content in the wake of Panda can be a huge problem. My site received a -950 penalty which we are starting to shake off now that we have removed our duplicate content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
