You May Also Like
The site's pages contained an inline popup layover thingie. You know, the page gets dimmed, the inline popup appears and then you have to click somewhere?
No biggie - popups work, after all - but this popup was different. This popup pretended to be a "spam" blocker. What? You're not a spammer?!?! Well, click the +1 and get immediate access to the site! It's that simple!
A kerfuffle broke out with the offending company claiming to be not only fully above the board with this but also that Google is A-OK with it.
Which seems too silly to be true - and Joe Hall quickly pointed it out:
Yet the weird truth of the matter is that as long as no money or prizes exchange hands, publishers may exchange content for clicks:
Publishers may not direct users to click a Google+ Button for purposes of misleading users. Publishers may not promote prizes, monies, or monetary equivalents in exchange for Google+ Button clicks. For the avoidance of doubt, Publishers may direct users to a Google+ Button to enable content and functionality. When a Publisher directs users to a Google+ Button, the button action must be related to the Publisher or the Publishers content.
-- Google button policy (Ed.:yes, they have a button policy )*
Not long after Alan Bleiweiss - not a stranger to uncovering even criminal activities during an SEO audit - became involved the company decided to take the popup down.
I think they did the right thing there. I also wouldn't be surprised if the company actually did receive confirmation that this " having to click +1 to get access to content " from Google. I'm pretty sure you're as surprised as I am to read that, yes, Google's policies are OK with this.
What do you think about this line in Google's policy? Surprised?
* button policy archived here.
My paid passion at Search Engine People sees me applying my passions and knowledge to a wide array of problems, ones I usually experience as challenges. People who know me know I love coffee.